<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.livejournal.com/bots/ -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:lj="http://www.livejournal.com">
  <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:seanan_mcguire</id>
  <title>Rose-Owls and Pumpkin Girls</title>
  <subtitle>The Journal of Seanan McGuire</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>Seanan McGuire</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2015-12-07T16:05:59Z</updated>
  <lj:journal userid="15372523" username="seanan_mcguire" type="personal"/>
  <link rel="service.feed" type="application/x.atom+xml" href="http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/data/atom" title="Rose-Owls and Pumpkin Girls"/>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:lj:livejournal.com:atom1:seanan_mcguire:649110</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/649110.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/data/atom/?itemid=649110"/>
    <title>seanan_mcguire @ 2015-12-07T08:05:00</title>
    <published>2015-12-07T16:05:59Z</published>
    <updated>2015-12-07T16:05:59Z</updated>
    <lj:music>Hadestown, "His Kiss, The Riot."</lj:music>
    <content type="html">We are deep into the Thirteen Days of Hogswatch now, which means a new giveaway post is going live every day.  Starting tomorrow, a new winners' post will also be going live every day.  Fun!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thus far, all of this year's giveaways have been RNG drawings.  This means I am using a random number generator to select the winners, and this is where my request comes in.  See, I'm seeing a &lt;i&gt;lot&lt;/i&gt; of people replying to other peoples' giveaway entries.  I need you to stop doing that.  Please.  Only top-level comments can win; if a reply to a comment grabs the winning entry, &lt;i&gt;I choose another winner&lt;/i&gt;.  So if I pick, say, &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/rsearch/?tags=%2315"&gt;#15&lt;/a&gt; to win, and &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/rsearch/?tags=%2315"&gt;#15&lt;/a&gt; turns out to be a reply to &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/rsearch/?tags=%2314"&gt;#14&lt;/a&gt;, I don't go down a comment.  I hit the RNG again.  That means that whoever replied to &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/rsearch/?tags=%2314"&gt;#14&lt;/a&gt; has just caused the "real" &lt;a href="http://www.livejournal.com/rsearch/?tags=%2315"&gt;#15&lt;/a&gt; not to win.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I do this for a lot of reasons, the most important being that the sub-comments throw off my count, I start second-guessing, I'm doing this manually, and so it's just easier on my peace of mind to draw again.  But it's still not fair to the people leaving the top-level comments.  Please, please stop replying to other peoples' giveaway entries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, please remember that when I say "the rules of this giveaway are...," that there is no room for negotiation.  If I say "name your favorite fruit" and you comment with "I love fruit!," you actually cannot win, because you didn't follow the rules.  This is to filter out the free stuff blogs that send their followers here to harvest prizes, but who don't actually have any investment in the things I'm handing out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank you all.  Today's post will go live in a few hours.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
