Thoughts on Writing #49: Leave Reviewers Alone.
And now, because context is king, our expanded thought:
Try not to argue with reviewers in public places. It makes you look petty and it makes them feel attacked, and that's going to start a vicious spiral leading all the way down into the deepest, darkest depths of Hell. Feel free to whine at your friends if that makes you feel better, but don't make public scenes, and don't make huffy comments where other people are going to find them. Also, if everyone who's known to be a friend of yours starts attacking the reviewer? People are maybe gonna catch on. Play nice.
This one isn't very complicated on the surface: reviews are for readers. Now, most of us are readers. Sometimes, reviews are for us. When are the reviews not for us? When they're reviews of our books, or of books written by our friends. When those reviews come to the party, we're not invited. And sure, it can seem like we're invited, especially when those reviews are posted publicly on the internet; after all, it wouldn't be public if everyone wasn't allowed to comment, right?
Wrong. Today we're going to be talking about reviews, why they're not for us, and why you don't want to know what happens when you engage.
Ready? Good. Let's begin.
Bad Reviews Happen.
There is literally no book in the world that has been a) published for people to read who are neither the writer's parent nor married to the writer, b) actually been read by people who fall into neither of the above categories, and c) had honest, not-paid-for, not-swapped-with-other-writers reviews posted that has not received a bad review. True fact! The best book you've ever read has been one-starred somewhere in the world. The worst book you've ever read has been five-starred. This is because of a lot of different factors, but the biggest one to keep in mind is that everyone is different, everyone likes different things, and when you're on the internet, everyone gets to have an opinion.
One of my favorite books is an absolutely bizarre, incredibly sexual New Weird novel called Santa Steps Out. Based on the number of times I've read and recommended it, this book should be considered an easy five-star in the shelving system of me. But I guarantee you it's a book that has more one-star reviews than five-star reviews, because it's three hundred plus pages of Santa Claus having sex with things. It's not everybody's ball of wax, and that's okay. No large group of humans was ever going to absolutely agree on absolutely everything.
Bad reviews happen to the best of us. Take a deep breath, and let it go.
And believe me, I know full well that this is easier said than done. Sometimes I want to argue with people who give me bad reviews that I feel are unfair. I do not do this. If someone gives me a bad review that is based on a factual inaccuracy (like the time someone said that the fact that I was clearly male meant that my female characters were unbelievable), I may send a private correction. I also may not. A lot of it depends on whether I've ever met the reviewer...and, honestly, whether I'm afraid of over-zealous friends riding in to defend my honor. I don't sic my friends on reviewers, but I am also not the queen wasp of a telepathic hive-mind, and if someone makes a personal attack toward me (rather than attacking the text, which is something altogether different), there's a chance other people will get involved. So in the case of the reviewer who firmly asserted that I was a man, I sent a private correction before they got the internet dropped on their head.
(They may have felt attacked anyway, because as the author, I have a lot more "weight" behind my words than a random blogger does. I hope not. I really was trying to spare them being actually attacked. It's still possible, which is why I thought long and hard before sending that email.)
But Writing A Book Is Hard and They're Being Mean.
Okay. Look:
Not every bad review is mean. Sometimes bad reviews happen because the book is bad, or because the book wasn't what the reader wanted, or because of a million other factors that you can't really control once the book is written. Reasons I have received bad reviews:
* This book has faeries in it.
* I don't know what the word "necrosis" means.
* Mira Grant books are better why is she wasting her time with this shit.
* I love Mira Grant and I hate urban fantasy why is this book urban fantasy.
* Not enough sex.
* Too much sex.
* I went to high school with the author and she's stupid and fat and ugly and she smells.
...I mean, I've also received bad reviews that are a lot less comic and more difficult to laugh off. I've received bad reviews that made me cry (although, to be fair, sometimes I cry over insurance commercials). That doesn't mean they were intentionally cruel.
Yes, you will encounter bad reviews that are also mean reviews. Reviews that mention your physical appearance? Are probably mean. Reviews that attack you instead of attacking the writing? Might be mean. Reviews that say you should die? Mean. Does that mean you should respond to them?
No.
We hear a lot about authors behaving badly, because at the end of the day, on the internet, where we have the weight of our words behind us, there is a huge power imbalance between even the most novice author and the majority* of reviewers. That reviewer you just decided to take a self-important swipe at? Is sixteen, and you are now an adult attacking a child. You do not come out of this smelling like a rose.
And yes, there will be reviewers and bloggers who try to bait you. This is something that gets left out of the conversation sometimes. I've had people link me to the same bad review on Twitter a dozen times, and then start going "ooOOoOoOO is the big bad author AFRAID?!" when I don't say anything. This is what the "mute" button is for. If I replied, if I tried to defend myself, if I engaged, I would be giving them the ammo they needed to turn around and go "see? See? AUTHOR BEHAVING BADLY." Because of the power imbalance, whether real or assumed, I cannot let them goad me into responding.
People are going to dislike your book. People are going to be mean. I won't tell you to get over it or grow a thicker skin, because that's advice I have yet to take for myself. I will, however, tell you not to read those reviews.
Let it go.
(*I say "majority" because yes, there are famous reviewers. There are huge, influential, important reviewers. They are relatively rare, and usually focused on movies/music, not the sort of books I write, or that most of my friends write. If a reviewer for People magazine felt the need to say something personal about me, I might respond, because in that case, the power imbalance would decidedly not be in my favor. The odds of this ever happening, to me or to anyone reading this, are slim. Do not go looking for excuses to attack.)
People Say Reviews Are For Readers. I'm A Reader.
Every writer I know is a reader. But unlike every other reader in the world, we never get to interface with our own books from any sort of a distance. They are always, always personal. Look. A lot of people think that A Local Habitation is my weakest book, and they're probably right. It was the second book I ever wrote; it lacks the burning "start of a series" inspiration of Rosemary and Rue, and the technical proficiency of either An Artificial Night or Feed. It was always going to be in a bad spot as far as being treated fairly goes. Reviewers read it, and they see that it's not amazing, and they say so.
But for me, that book will always be the one I broke in the hallway at OVFF with Merav, wearing my pumpkin pants and talking until 3am. It will be the book I sent, chapter by chapter, to a good friend, as a sort of mystic token against miscarriage. It will be the book that proved I could do this "writing a novel" thing more than once, and I will never be rational about it, and reviewers who dislike it are not wrong, and their reviews are not for me. They are for them, and they are for you.
When those reviews are of your book, whether it's your personal best or your personal worst, they won't be for you either.
That's how it's got to be.
January 20 2016, 23:59:22 UTC 1 year ago
January 21 2016, 00:05:27 UTC 1 year ago
January 21 2016, 00:30:36 UTC 1 year ago
Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ.
January 21 2016, 01:14:29 UTC 1 year ago
A Local Habitation shows that software companies are the same everywhere, even in Faerie. Though hopefully without the murder part.
January 21 2016, 01:24:43 UTC 1 year ago
A Local Habitation was the first book of yours I read. I immediately bought Rosemary and Rue on kindle and devoured it. Possibly the same day, before bed.
January 21 2016, 02:13:56 UTC 1 year ago
January 21 2016, 06:37:43 UTC 1 year ago Edited: January 21 2016, 06:38:46 UTC
It was so bad that I had to stop reading the book partway through, and you know how often I do that.
I left what I felt was an honest, thoughtful, thorough review on Amazon and Goodreads, explaining my issues with the book and where I thought the author had done well -- and was promptly argued with, at length, by the author.
I tried discussing with the author, explaining and restating why I thought the things in the book were problematic, and why I wouldn't want my son to read it -- and then, very clearly, the author called in their legion of fans, and possibly sockpuppets.
As a result, I have literally had to turn off all of my emails from Amazon about replies to my reviews, because I can't turn them off for one review. Over a year later, I was still getting angry replies from people who -- if I checked their review history -- had left only five-star reviews for every thing this person had ever written, among any other reviews they had written.
I learned, from that, and let's be honest, from WORA, that responding to your detractors that way never does any good. Let it ride. You do more damage trying to defend your honor than by simply defending your honor by outputting more work.
Deleted comment
January 21 2016, 17:58:28 UTC 1 year ago
This is important, actually.
January 21 2016, 20:54:00 UTC 1 year ago Edited: January 21 2016, 20:59:31 UTC
If you're staring at a negative review and itching to say something, don't, not just for all the reasons Seanan said, but because being reviewed at all - no matter how negatively - is a kind of compliment. Remember that. Even vendetta reviews are, really, because they mean the reviewer thought you were important enough to talk about, even if just to try to take you down.
And leaving aside vendetta reviews - like the Rabids attempt to game Goodreads - a sincere but negative review also means they thought you were worth the time they spent. You're worth the time they spent actually reading or listening to or watching your thing, and the time spent writing comments about it.
Remember - no matter how much they may've hated it, they still cared enough to take the time to write and post a thing about your work. In a world flooded with opportunities to read/watch/listen to/react to material, they listened to yours, and wrote about it, which means that you're worth that much to them, at very least.
After all, you're not writing about them, now, are you? Good. Keep it that way.
January 21 2016, 18:18:32 UTC 1 year ago
(yes, that's what I got out of the entire post)
January 21 2016, 18:28:00 UTC 1 year ago
As you say, that's not much of an argument. The amount of work a writer put into crafting a book imposes no obligation on a reader to like the result. And a review judges the result: An A for effort is not a final grade.
on reviews, comma, bad, and engaging, comma, not
January 21 2016, 21:06:42 UTC 1 year ago
Couldn't Agree More
January 21 2016, 21:11:19 UTC 1 year ago
Great read & couldn't agree more!
January 22 2016, 04:09:51 UTC 1 year ago
I make my spouse read any review under 3 stars, before I even look beyond "oh, few stars." He can distill anything that's useful to me out of it, and it keeps me from either sadface or blood pressure issues.
January 22 2016, 08:57:37 UTC 1 year ago
One was the writer (Seanan has probably even met him at some point) who took objection to my review and sallied in to tell me why I was Wrong on the Internet. When I told him, politely but firmly, that I was not interested in speaking with him, he stopped, but he must have talked about me SOMEWHERE, because then his fanboys came in to tell me how wrong I was, how I was obligated to talk to them about the book, and what a generally awful person I was. I was unlikely to buy another of his books again, but I have definitely told this story to everyone that I've discussed him with. Probably not a lot of impact, but I can dream.
The other experience was somewhat more tragic, in that the author contacted me to thank me for buying her book and leaving a review. And...she seemed very nice and sincere, but I still had to write her a very polite reply that I DID NOT WANT TO TALK TO HER. It's so difficult to leave an honest review when you feel like the author is birddogging their review, even if they're not a complete jerk or you like the book. If I want to interact with an author, I will seek them out in their spaces...like this comment. But in a place where I want to be able to freely talk about my feelings about a book, I don't want to feel like I'm being watched or have to worry about whether I'm hurting a writer's feelings by being honest. I'm not a monster, after all. It was incredibly awkward, because again, she only wanted to be friendly...but I wanted to be left alone.
US : Весь НЕ кириллический сегмент : Лучшие посты за вчер
January 22 2016, 15:02:17 UTC 1 year ago
January 22 2016, 17:17:22 UTC 1 year ago
January 24 2016, 14:17:01 UTC 1 year ago
Well, my first book got completely raked over coals by her. She was also right, in that she picked out some heavily used tropes, and made wicked fun of them. It wasn't even a bad review, necessarily, as she said she enjoyed the book, but this particular reviewer didn't spare books she liked. She was sometimes called a troll because of how she reviewed, because even books she liked were open for mockery. Thing is? The review was fucking hilarious. I didn't care if she got a couple small details wrong. It made me drown in a sea of giggles, At the time (this was, oh, 2007), I linked it on my blog because back then, it wasn't so much a Thing for fans to harass reviewers in defense of authors they loved, especially when said author left a note to the tune of, "Look, if I think this is hysterically funny, you do not get to go 'defend my honor' for me." People usually respected that.
Now, it's a totally different world, and if I ran into that same sort of review of my books on Amazon or Goodreads (which I'm sure I will, once I get around to finishing things and publishing them... editing has been taking up more of my time lately), I would share privately with friends that I knew would also find it funny, but I wouldn't post about it -- because I would be afraid that despite my saying, leave the reviewer alone, this is one of the most hilarious reviews I've ever gotten, people would not pay attention and instead mob the poor reviewer.
And coming from the above background, I think that's really pretty sad. :-\
January 27 2016, 20:50:23 UTC 1 year ago Edited: January 27 2016, 20:50:47 UTC
Which brings me back to the reviews. I think I'm going to try very, very hard to avoid them. Like, I just don't want to read them/see them/whatever. I don't think I have to worry about myself ever arguing with a reviewer; I've watched the dramas play out on Twitter and Goodreads long enough and often enough to know better. But I just...don't think I can handle it.