Seanan McGuire (seanan_mcguire) wrote,
Seanan McGuire
seanan_mcguire

  • Mood:
  • Music:

The Park is open; your ticket is not valid.

I want to start by saying that when it comes to movies about dinosaurs eating people, I am so the target audience that they would still make a profit even if I was the only one who wanted to see it happen. It might take a little longer—one blonde does not a multi-million dollar opening make—but they'd get there, given time. My number of lifetime viewings of Jurassic Park passed the double digits before I turned twenty (and it was much harder to re-watch things when I was a teenager, on account of I am older than DVD or streaming video). My number of lifetime readings of the book and its sequel is much higher. I've seen Jurassic Park: The Lost World and Jurassic Park III about five times each, which is more than any sensible person should.

Why am I giving you my dinosaur geek cred? Because I want to be clear that when Jurassic World was announced, I was one hundred and seventy percent on-fucking-board. I was there. Literally the only thing that kept me from the first showing on Thursday night was the fact that I had dental surgery Thursday morning, and did not understand how hands worked. When I saw the first trailer, I cried. I am not ashamed of that. I have been going to Jurassic Park for my entire adult life, and yeah, if they announced the opening of the Isla Sorna location tomorrow, I'd sell a kidney if that was what it took to get me there. Bets have been taken as to whether I will one day walk down the aisle to the Jurassic Park theme.

(I probably won't. But let's face it, a dinosaur-themed wedding would be pretty fucking sweet.)

But there was one thing that made me a little...let's go with "nervous" even during trailers, when I was shushing people who tried to talk to me during my special dinosaur time. And that was the fact that you had Bryce Dallas Howard's lovely Claire—and "lovely" is a necessary qualifier for a woman who's wearing solid white and high heels and putting that much effort into straightening her hair in Costa Rica—but that was, well. About it for humans of the female persuasion. (In the JP canon, most if not all dinosaurs you encounter will be female, due to the cloning process that makes them. This does not actually count as having gender balance. Honest.)

Wasn't going to stop me from going. After all, Jurassic Park III had lousy gender balance, with only Amanda and Ellie really keeping up the side, and it's generally regarded as the worst of the original three. Surely the filmmakers would look at that and say "Yeah, little girls found their way into the franchise through Lex as a viewpoint and Ellie as an aspiration, just like little boys had the combo of Tim and Alan! Let's make sure we keep everyone at the party!" Part of my passion for this franchise comes from the fact that when I was a little girl, Jurassic Park was actually willing to invite me in. Surely the trailers were leaving something out.

They weren't.

There are four named female characters in this film. That's a lot! (Technically there may be more, because there are women on one of the two mook squads, and their names show up on a big fancy board that shows us when they die. But given that I am not actually sure that one of the four I'm including in the "official count" actually gets named on screen, I am disinclined to give credit for "named female character" based on "you labeled a picture that may or may not have been the actual actress on the screen, since we never really saw their faces. So, four.) Let's run them down, in order of appearance:

* THE MOM. In the grand tradition of visits to the Park, there are children, and for the second time, the children get to have a mother, pretty much entirely so she can tell our career-focused female "lead" that she needs to make some babies of her own. The Mom's name is Karen. The Mom does not make it to the island until the very end, but still has the second-highest number of lines of any woman in the movie. (The first time was Jurassic Park III, when Amanda went to the island looking for her son.)

* THE CAREER WOMAN. Oh, Claire. Claire is our "female lead," and much has been made of the fact that no, really, the actress insisted on doing the whole part in high heels, honest, she wanted to run in the jungle in heels. And maybe she did! Hell, when I used to do Horror Survival Sleepaway Camp, running in heels was fun. The fact remains that the central woman in this film is presented as unflinchingly wrong for focusing on her career, and in fact, not very good at what she does, given that somehow she hasn't noticed that her biggest dinosaur sometimes disappears for no reason. She's basically here to give Owen the raptor dude someone to mack on. (And is, in fact, given the highest praise of all when her nephews tell her that her boyfriend is cool.)

* THE ASSISTANT. Zara is Claire's calm, collected, efficient British assistant, who is assigned to watch the nephews (which is what makes her evil, according to the narrative; how dare she do her job when Claire, who has apparently had two teen boys dumped on her with little to no warning, actually has to keep the Park operational), and who is given the dubious honor of being the first human female to die on-screen in the franchise. She also has the single most agonizing, drawn-out death in the entire franchise. The villains get quicker, cleaner, less gonna give the kids nightmares deaths than Zara does, for the crime of...not being the blood relative of the boys she was trying to keep an eye on? (I have seen people defending this as "well, dinosaurs aren't sexist." The trouble is, when you have four named women, and you do this, it's not the dinosaurs making choices. It's the directors.)

* THE PROOF THAT JURASSIC WORLD EMPLOYS WOMEN, NO, HONEST. Vivian is one of our two control room viewpoint characters. If her name was actually said during the movie, I missed it. She seems to exist purely to look sad and/or distressed, and so that Lowery—the control room employee whose choices actually matter, who is cool and obsessed with the original Park and really cares about the fate of this one—can try to kiss her when he decides to make his last stand. A kiss which she rebuffs with an awkward "I have a boyfriend," not a "SWEET JESUS WHY WOULD YOU TRY TO KISS YOUR CO-WORKER ARE YOU FUCKING HIGH."

As in the original movie, we have two viewpoint children. This time, they're both boys. Why? There's nothing about either of them that is essentially "this is a male character." Zack is at the age where he's noticing girls, and fun fun fun, this meant that for the pre-all hell breaks loose portion of the movie, he is constantly oogling the teenage girls around him. A pattern that is echoed with Owen/Claire and Lowery/Vivian. That is what you're for, says the movie. You're here so that, should a male lead want you for his prize, you will be available.

Claire is not deadweight. She does some cool stuff. Zara...well, Zara dies, and Vivian cries, and Karen lectures her little sister on the importance of family. My problem is not that Claire is in over her head and doing it all in high heels. My problem is that she's supposedly the lead and it takes all of five minutes for her to become the sidekick in someone else's film. My problem is that even saying "well, the dinosaurs are all female" doesn't cause this movie to pass the Bechdel. My problem is that it's tired. How interesting would it have been to keep the same cast and make it Clark and Olive, instead of Claire and Owen? Let him run around the jungle in suit and tie; let her have a velociraptor army. How easy would it have been to write another boy/girl kid pair, as in the first, and give everyone an easy entrance?

(None of this touches on my issues with the theme park economics of Jurassic World, or the sheer ludicrousness of the overhead shots containing no strollers or wheelchairs. I go to Disneyland a lot. Unless they actively do not allow disabled people on Isla Nublar, that is not what their main drag looks like.)

I gasped and teared up when the camera cut to the first full view of the Park, because I have been dreaming of going there for my entire life. That is the theme park of my heart.

I still feel a little bit like they've just said I can't renew my Annual Pass.
Tags: at the movies, cranky blonde is cranky
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 68 comments
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →
tangent, related to JP and sexism... The first movie stands out to me as a movie-adapted-from-a-book making a change that I like BETTER than the book depiction, what with in the book the boy being into dinosaurs AND computers, and the girl being mostly a burden, and the movie giving her the computer interest and a great facet of the saving-the-day bit (or at least saving the remaining survivors)
um, yeah. I wonder if at some point in my lifetime there will be a point where I think, "yes, we're definitely making progress on the sexism thing" instead of "am I imagining things or is the sexism getting WORSE?"
I share this thought.

beable

2 years ago

melchar

2 years ago

kyttiekait

June 13 2015, 15:24:47 UTC 2 years ago Edited:  June 13 2015, 15:26:37 UTC

Thank you for giving a review for this film. I value your opinion as someone who makes things I like and likes things I like.
I still have plans to see it with friends and am so looking forward to that full view cut, and to all the dinosaurs.
I hope the dinosaurs were pretty awesome at least?

It makes me a little sad though that you were so pumped for this and it disappointed you. Clearly someone in Hollywood owes you a better dinosaur movie.
The dinosaurs were amazing. I cheered a lot.

I am fully capable of cheering for dinosaurs while being disappointed in humans.
Jurassic park leather bomber jacket! Too bad it don't fit me no more, and the collar has gone past fraying.

I did wear it to the Jurassic Park rerelease -- just had to hold my breath or not zip it up...

Tomorrow morning, come hell or high water, I'm going to an IMAX theater.

Great review.
Have fun!

Deleted comment

Both are worth seeing. Depending on how you react to blatant gender issues in cinema, you may prefer Fury Road.

Deleted comment

As a man, I feel that even if I were to be actively activist in this area, it would be disregarded. It makes me, sad, too, though; and humanity disappoints me on a regular basis.

In other news, I am getting better at predicting which groups of tweets will make an appearance on LJ.
Honestly, I think the only way this changes is if men and women start making a fuss about this. Right now, there's a lot of "if it's all men, the women will come anyway, if it's all women, we lose the men" sentiment, and I just don't think that's true.

rocannon

2 years ago

Hello! Your entry got to top-25 of the most popular entries in LiveJournal!
Learn more about LiveJournal Ratings in FAQ.
At least you can feel less guilty for rooting for the dinosaurs to eat everyone?

Seriously, I hate it when it seems like women only exist because the writer or director wanted some romantic attention for the men. And they get the support roles then.
So annoyingly much -this-. Yes, I like fantasy and science fictions and all sorts of improbable circumstances, but I want strong female characters. ... and yes, I'd also like more male eye-candy, displayed as the sex-objects some of them can be. Given strong characters to play, both sexes can run around in costumes made of a few bits of string and I won't mind at all!

seanan_mcguire

2 years ago

Aw man, I'm disappointed to hear this, though I suppose not really surprised. I haven't kept up with the franchise, but I have fond memories of seeing the original. But this makes me pretty sure it's not worth the trouble of arranging childcare to see in-theater. (That's a fairly high bar to clear for us anyway, honestly.)

And the book is a large part of the reason I have a degree in genetics, rather than some other area of science. I was reading it the week our GATE program brought a woman out from CSH labs to give us seventh-graders a seminar on DNA. By the end of that, I was completely hooked. :)
Alas, no, I would not call this film worth child care (and it is WAY too graphic and scary to be child-appropriate for a few years).
I saw the movie last night and loved it. I wanted my own pack of velociraptors after, and even though it was basically the first movie all over again and everything that happened was predictable, I still loved it. But there were moments in the film where I felt this twinge of discomfort, and I couldn't quite place what it was. Bad dialogue? Bad...something?

And then I read your post this morning, and it clicked. That's why Claire's character didn't ring true for me, because she was nothing more than a Hollywood cliche, right up until she decided to go and (um, major spoilers regarding the end of the movie, but pretty much I thought it was the most awesome thing ever, and it made me - finally - love her). That being said, the fact that she did this awesome thing while standing in 3-4 inch stiletto heels she'd been running around the jungle in all day did strike me as the height of ridiculous, especially when she knew she was going to have to be running like she'd never run before in the next few seconds. My brain went: "WTF?" To say nothing of the complete lack of reality that she would be able to outrun what she was running from, but whatever.

Anyway, I am a huge fan of romance and love stories. The love story in this movie felt so forced, I cringed most of the times it was happening, even with Chris Pratt involved (and I adore him.) I thought at the time it was written badly, and it was...because of the heavy handed, ham fisted way Claire's character was handled, and the fact that the romance and her relationship w/her sister and nephews were ALL used as this measure of how horrible she was to be a woman focused on her career before these attachments. Oh look, but at the end, she has unquestioningly lost her job, connected with her nephews, and opened her heart to love. She is a better woman now. *sigh* They could have written that so much better, even keeping Claire and Owen in their current roles. WHAT IF they were already a couple when the movie started, ala Alan Grant and Ellie Sattler. WHAT IF she was the ultra-prepared woman, who working in a giant woodland park knew her job might take her anywhere at any time, and always kept a spare pair of running shoes and jeans in a go bag? WHAT IF she brought her nephew (and niece, the teenager so could have been a girl) in for a week because she LITERALLY has the coolest job on the planet, and wanted to share it with her family? How hard would any of this have been, seriously.

Anyway, still enjoyed the movie for what it was. Everything dinosaur related had an awesome payoff by the end. I will own it. But I so wish the B story had gone with "what if", instead of going with the cliche.
If I worked at a dinosaur theme park, and my nephew were old enough to fly on his own, I'd be all 'Hey, Sister, why don't you let Nephew come visit me? You and Brother-in-Law can have a quiet romantic vacation/catch up on work* while I take Nephew to Jurassic Park?"

* Actually, I suspect the entire family would come, because my sister and brother-in-law would want to see the dinosaurs too. Actually, come to think about it, my sister is probably more qualified to work on dinosaurs than I am: she has the biology minor and wanted to go into animal behavior. (Hence why she'd think dinosaurs were amazing.)

seanan_mcguire

2 years ago

The kid shows I have seen lately (e.g. Doc McStuffins and Peg plus Cat)) do a better job with female characters and even relationships than the adult movies...I was going to be depressed about this, but maybe conditioning the next generation to expect better is the way we finally drag Hollywood kicking and screaming past its issues.

I sure do hope so.

Deleted comment

Dinosaurs make so much better.
There were two things that definitely felt sexist to me in this movie and how they treated Claire. The first was when the boys saw her in the park for the first time after returning from their adventure and she's just saved Owen from the flying thing and the boys want to stay with HIM, not HER. Um, hello. They've never seen this guy before. How are they supposed to know he's the badass dino trainer? The second is at the very end when everyone is sitting in the hanger bay looking shell shocked. She is probably the highest ranking official from InGen present, since everyone else got eaten or is not on the island. She should not be sitting under a blankie, waiting for someone to come pick her up. She ought to be getting survivor reports, organizing the evacuation, on the phone with shareholders, SOMETHING that has to do with her job. Not sitting passively. It didn't feel true to her character.
Yup.
I was willing to overlook the two brothers thing, I'm willing to overlook a lot in the face of two child actors that didn't make me want to smack them. And for the small divorce subplot it kind of makes sense, one of each would be more likely to be split up removing much of the uncertainty the younger one felt. But I did have a huge problem with the Main street USA section myself. Our erstwhile hero is being, let's face it eaten, when Claire saves the day. I won't spoil it but she rocks, the boys are flabbergasted having witnessed her badassery. Then they turn around in the next 5 minutes and ask to stay with the meal not the only person they saw end the buffet before dessert. That I could not forgive. It felt so schizophrenic, and it happened repeatedly that they gave her awesome moments of kicking ass then had the boys fawn all over the male lead. I do truely wonder what ended up on the cutting room floor to make way for Star Lord to shine brighter.
I wonder that, too.
Owen and the dinosaurs were about the only good thing in the movie. I will see it again. Especially since my theater had a power outage right after the big fight between the two dinosaurs.
"Owen and The Dinosaurs" is the name of my new psychedelic rock cover band.

juglore

2 years ago

seanan_mcguire

2 years ago

juglore

2 years ago

I was suspecting this might happen, and I'm at least glad to be prepared going in for it. I'll be cheering for dinosaurs (because my five year old heart is still a paleontologist), but dammit.
Yay dinosaurs!
Well that sounds shitty. Was it at least tolerable?
Oh, yeah. Dinosaurs ate people.

adafrog

2 years ago

I have not yet seen the movie, so all I can comment on is this: I did not walk down the aisle to the JP theme song, but we did walk out to it afterwards, and there was a footnote on the bottom of the ceremony programs that said "No velociraptors were created in the development of this wedding."
That is awesome!

seanan_mcguire

2 years ago

I cant wait to see it.
Good!
Yes, the dinosaurs are all female! Yes, they communicate! THEY TALK ABOUT DUDES.

Sigh.

Yes, I also teared up over the first pan of the park, with the full JP theme and that made me feel a lot of feels. Mostly, the movie was soulless.
Sadly, yes.
I was hoping Imperator Furiosa would show up and save the innocent from Indominus Rex. Instead we had badly run corporations acting stupidly, greedy corporations acting evil, and lots of very prominent product placements from real world brands cashing in on the phenomenon of a half-gigabuck opening weekend.
It was flashy, fast, full of emotional punch at the right times, and has (I think) the typical bugs and features of all action movies today. It was worth matinee price to me because of the group I saw it with, not on it's own merit.

Why would anyone stock a theme-park-kiosk first aid kit with a road flare?
I was willing to roll with the road flare because of the "we might need a helicopter evac" aspect of them being on an island. Also, Trexy.
The most egregious sin the movie committed is now after reading this, I can totally picture the movie recast with Chris Pratt as the suit wearing executive running around the jungle being awkward and witty and hopelessly inept without Bryce Dallas Howard's badass raptor-training competence to yank him back by his tie before he runs off a cliff. And it is so so much better. Not just as a movie, but for both of those actors, who could play (and WOULD play) those roles with wild abandon.

(And Zara's death scene deeply unsettled me, moreso than most slasher flick death scenes even. I actually left the theater feeling uncomfortably like someone in the studio had some kind of grudge against the actress, it honestly felt that personal and unnecessary).
(Not that I mean Claire was awkward or hopelessly inept, btw....just that by virtue of Chris Pratt cast in the Claire role it automatically becomes blended in my head with his Star Lord and even Andy Dwyer characters too).

onefishonly

2 years ago

angelan

2 years ago

seanan_mcguire

2 years ago

I played the mobile game that's out and yeah, it gave me terrible feelings. Sad that the movie is as bad as the game makes it out to be.
But yes, it seems that films are getting MORE sexist as they go along.
And it's weird and I don't like it, and I have to wonder how much of it is tied to toy marketing, which has become more and more aggressively gendered.
Also, at the very least, Vivian could've had a girlfriend instead of a boyfriend to vaguely reference as a reason not to kiss Lowery. (I thought they were saying 'Larry' every time they said 'Lowery'. (I was calling him 'Nick' and Vivian 'Officer Fischer' the whole time in my head, because I apparently can't separate actors' various roles.)

Where the hell are all the queer dinosaur scientists and control room people and park guests?

Like I don't think I even saw any queer couples (excluding 'straight-passing' couples (I hate that term)) in background group shots of park attendees. I'm disturbed by that on a gut level: these movies are in a way massively, massively promoting the importance of family, but only if it's the standard nuclear family, or one with divorced parents, or parents on the brink of divorce. Even the 'found family' of Alan, Ellie, Lex, and Tim in JP adheres to that formula. But that's a whole other can of worms.

The problematic stuff aside, though, I got a lot of joy out of JW. The glorious scenery. The music. The old visitor centre asjkdhafk;lsk;af.
Oh, very good point.

And I'm with you, really. I criticize because I care.
K (my eldest) and Finch (their partner) went to this and came home laughing with many rolled eyes at how bad it was from a gender standpoint. But they weren't emotionally invested in it. I just feel like in 2015 the directors should fucking know better, you know?
Agreed.
Previous
← Ctrl ← Alt
Next
Ctrl → Alt →