It has become customary in recent years for authors of Hugo-nominated works to provide the members of the World Science Fiction convention who get to vote for the awards with electronic copies of their stories. The ball started rolling a few years ago when John Scalzi kindly took the initiative in preparing the first Hugo voters packet; since then it has become almost mandatory to distribute shortlisted works this way.
Unfortunately, as professionally published authors, we can't do this without obtaining the consent of our publishers. We are bound by contracts that give our publishers the exclusive rights to distribute our books: so we sought their permission first.
This year, Orbit—the publisher of Mira Grant's Parasite, Ann Leckie's Ancillary Justice, and Charles Stross's Neptune's Brood—have decided that for policy reasons they can't permit the shortlisted novels to be distributed for free in their entirety. Instead, substantial extracts from the books will be included in the Hugo voters packet.
We feel your disappointment keenly and regret any misunderstandings that may have arisen about the availability of our work to Hugo voters, but we are bound by the terms of our publishing contracts. The decision to give away free copies of our novels is simply not ours to take. However, we are discussing the matter with other interested parties, and working towards finding a solution that will satisfy the needs of the WSFS voters and our publishers in future years.
Finally, please do not pester our editors: the decision was taken above their level. Don't pester anyone else, either. The issue is closed.
Signed,
(Mira Grant (aka Seanan McGuire), Ann Leckie, Charles Stross)
May 13 2014, 15:53:48 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2014, 11:56:25 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 16:10:57 UTC 3 years ago
I feel bad for all of you, I think you were previously handicapped by only having a pdf copy, and now this.
Ann Leckie, being less established, but with a fantastic novel is also going to be hurt by this. I *already* buy all of your books, but I only ended up hearing about her's from I think Scalzi's big idea.
May 15 2014, 01:14:45 UTC 3 years ago
We forget how recently the packet was created, I think.
3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 16:25:52 UTC 3 years ago
May 15 2014, 01:15:05 UTC 3 years ago
Deleted comment
May 13 2014, 16:40:52 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 16:33:13 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:03:16 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
Deleted comment
May 13 2014, 17:28:40 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
Deleted comment
May 13 2014, 16:56:24 UTC 3 years ago
May 15 2014, 01:18:38 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:07:28 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:35:09 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:39:23 UTC 3 years ago
I'm not ticked at you or even them, I understand business is business and unfortunately some people abuse the system and distribute what they ought not.
It does seem to handicap the authors though since then people can't make their voting decisions as easily.
May 15 2014, 02:01:51 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:48:26 UTC 3 years ago
May 15 2014, 02:02:21 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 17:58:50 UTC 3 years ago
I bought a voting membership, intending to vote.. The voting membership was a bit of a stretch, but I thought, since it was all I needed to spend, I could make it work. It doesn't seem fair to vote without having read all the works...
Hmm.
I'll find some way to work around this. Perhaps if I ask today interlibrary loan can get me the books in time. I could check at both the Carson Newman Library and the Jefferson City Library and that would probably double my chances.
Don't worry; I can make this fly.
May 15 2014, 02:03:06 UTC 3 years ago
Also you gave me a copy of your last CD; send me your mailing address (website contact form) and I can toss you an author's copy of Parasite.
May 13 2014, 18:16:10 UTC 3 years ago
May 15 2014, 02:06:20 UTC 3 years ago
And I think that the gnat might have more influence. It can bite.
May 13 2014, 19:12:51 UTC 3 years ago
It's very disappointing that people who are not you have made this decision :(
May 15 2014, 02:06:29 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 20:21:37 UTC 3 years ago
May 20 2014, 15:29:11 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 20:56:54 UTC 3 years ago
But I guess they picked a good year to do it, at least. If they published three out of the five nominated books, and one of the other two is fifteen massive volumes long (and this not really readable in its entirety unless you've already read most of it), that leaves only one novel that can really be read and evaluated for free in its entirety, so it's not like one book gets disadvantaged over all the others.
Good thing I already read 2 out of 3 of these books, though. Time to put myself on the (possibly long by now) reserve list at the library for the third. Also, I should buy my voting membership - but I wanted to make sure there would be a packet in the first place before I did that. (Because surprises like this clearly happen. And I'm not going to vote unless I have access to the materials under consideration.)
Still, I hope that, moving forward, they find a way to make it work.
May 20 2014, 15:29:40 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 22:08:36 UTC 3 years ago
I wonder how much this is impacted by Orbit having 3 best novel nominees instead of, say, one.
May 14 2014, 09:28:18 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
May 13 2014, 22:53:51 UTC 3 years ago
May 20 2014, 15:30:29 UTC 3 years ago
May 13 2014, 23:03:18 UTC 3 years ago
I can't imagine any of them can hold a candle to Parasite, but I ought to read them none the less.
May 20 2014, 15:30:38 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2014, 00:28:54 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2014, 02:17:41 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
May 14 2014, 05:31:25 UTC 3 years ago
May 20 2014, 15:31:13 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2014, 06:36:31 UTC 3 years ago
So how can Hugo voters vote on Best Book if, for some of the nominated works, they cannot read the entire book? It seems as though Orbit don't want to give their authors a fair chance of winning, and that is a shame. I hope they reconsider.
May 14 2014, 16:15:45 UTC 3 years ago
Please understand, I do not support this decision. Like, really don't. I've been in the packet for the last three years, I like being in the packet, and I didn't want the internet dropped on my head yet again this year. But.
The Academy Awards are voted by the Academy, which has a limited membership, more akin to the Nebulas than the Hugos, which are more People's Choice or Billboard Music Awards (neither of which gives free material to their voting public). Not only that, the members of the Academy receive watermarked screeners, so that any piracy can be tracked down and punished, and many of them admit that they don't watch everything.
In this case, the Hugo voters are "people with a membership to a con; the membership is unlimited, and everyone in the world could potentially buy one (even if they won't)" Not only that, but X number must have already read the book, to have nominated it, which proves that these are potential customers. The Voter's Packet is a new beast, less than a decade old, created to increase awareness and interest. It's not an obligation. Publishers sign nothing saying "yeah, go for it." We go to them every year, hats in hand, and ask. In this case, a UK publisher looked at a UK con that's on track to be the largest Worldcon in decades, and said "uh, no, that is the same number of people as your last book's sales."
I still think they're wrong; I still think the Voter's Packet is the way to go. But I also thing this reaction of entitlement and "there is no possible way we could possibly acquire the books through any legal means" is part of why they made this choice. (And no, I am not saying you must must must buy my books. Just that, for most people, a healthy sample is enough to hit "like it" or "hate it," and once at "like it," there are ebooks, and in the UK, paperbacks, if you care enough to want to finish.)
3 years ago
May 15 2014, 15:59:45 UTC 3 years ago
The four of us loved Parasite. My daugher (13) and I have it at the top of our list so far, but we haven't read Neptune's Brood yet. My son liked Warbound more, but he's more a sword than a laser. Even so, he said "Mom, is the next one out yet? And will the audio come out at the same time as the book?"
May 20 2014, 15:31:35 UTC 3 years ago
May 16 2014, 11:58:47 UTC 3 years ago
It doesn't surprise me that people are being entitled about it, because even though it's a bonus, people have come to expect it. I also suspect it's probably not helped by that Tor has announced they will be including the entirety of the Wheel of Time series in the voter packet (which is, what, thirteen books? Something like that? My partner had a squee-gasm when they announced that, a couple days after I said I'd be buying a supporting membership; we have most of the series physically, but the books are so long and heavy my partner can no longer physically read them, because arthritis sucks, but 13 books is... ouchy to the wallet, esp when until recently even the backlist ebooks were priced around $10-12). Tor and Orbit are entirely different publishing companies, but I'm not sure the average reader is that aware, or even cares.
It's super not cool that people are giving you guys, the authors, crap over it. It's in no way in your control, and if I see any of that on my friends list/etc, some noggins are gonna get bonked. *offers sympathy cookies*
May 20 2014, 15:35:37 UTC 3 years ago
May 17 2014, 03:17:02 UTC 3 years ago
2. The short fiction is the glory of the voters' packet, because though many short pieces are available in anthology form, some are from periodicals, also known as "ephemera." As in, destroyed after the next issue comes out and not available at all.
3. I was introduced to your work through the Hugo packet in 2011. I was surprised to find out about your backlist but derived some comfort from the fact that despite its size, you hadn't been published for very long (I'm a mom, being a couple of years behind the times is nothing.)
4. Discovering your work in 2011 has led to me buying most of the rest of your work. Remember, the first hit is free.
I don't expect Orbit to get it right, though I wish they would. "Exposure" is not really that valuable in certain fields (namely, when people want your work for free so you get "exposure"), but in terms of authors in a fairly saturated market, it can lead to future sales. I hope that they redo the calculations before next year, but we'll be buying your book and own one of the others, so it shouldn't be too hard to buy or borrow the third. (The Wheel of Time is going to be an e-book replacement for our physical copies.)
May 20 2014, 15:36:22 UTC 3 years ago