And people wonder why I spend so much time wanting to set the world on fire.
I think it's very telling that the people who say it's wrong to want representation in fiction are almost overwhelmingly white. If I want to read about white people having amazing adventures and doing incredible things, being heroes and villains, simple and complicated, handsome and hideous, loved and hated, all I need to do is pick up a book at random. There is a literally 90% chance that I will get all those things from whatever book I've chosen, especially if I'm going for the "classic literature" of the science fiction/fantasy/horror world. 90%! And that may honestly be low-balling the number! If I were a straight white man, of course I wouldn't see any issue with representation in fiction—I'd be on every page I turned! Even as a straight white woman, I'd be on a lot of pages, even if half those pages would have me either naked or screaming (or both, if I had happened to grab a Gor book). There's no problem with representation here!
But I've never been a straight white man. I've never been a straight white girl, either. I was a bisexual kid with a lot of questions and not very many answers, and it wasn't until I encountered ElfQuest that I actually felt like I saw myself on a page. No, I didn't think I was an elf, although I sort of wished I was, because elves are awesome, but it was Cutter and Leetah and the rest who introduced me to the idea that I could love boys and girls, and not be a bad person. I wasn't indecisive or wicked. I just had a lot of love to give, and my set of criteria for who got it wasn't based on gender.
Let me restate that: I was already bi. I had already been attracted to girls, guys, and a kid in my class who went by "Pup" and refused to be pinned down to either gender (and my second grade teacher never forced Pup to commit either way, which was pretty damn cool of her, given that this was the 1980s). Books did not make me choose my sexuality; books told me a) that my sexuality existed, and b) that it was okay, it was natural, it was not proof that there was something wrong with me. And especially in grade school/middle school, sexuality is invisible in a way that very little else is. No one knew I was queer until I came out. It wasn't even a matter of openly hiding it; sex wasn't on the table, I didn't feel like sharing, I didn't share. No one knew that I was different. Everyone thought that when they read their books about little white girls having adventures, they were reading about me, too.
You know what's not invisible? Race. "I don't see race" is bull. When we read those books about little white kids having amazing adventures, we knew that it was white kids having adventures, because adventures are for white people. At the age of eight, we all understood that our non-white classmates were not represented in the books we read, and very few of us had the sophistication to jump to "this is a lack of representation." Instead, we jumped to "I guess Oz doesn't like black people." Because books shape your view of the world, books remake you in their image, and the books we had said little white kids go on adventures, little kids of any other race are nowhere to be seen.
This is a problem.
So some of us grew up, and for whatever reason—maybe it affected us directly, maybe it affected our friends, maybe it was just pointed out—we started trying to show a world that looked more like the world we actually lived in, where everything wasn't a monoculture. And for some reason, this is being taken as a threat. How dare you want little Asian kids to go on adventures. How dare you want queer teenagers to save the world. How dare you imply that transwomen can be perfectly ordinary, perfectly competent people who just want to not get eaten by the dinosaur that's been eating everyone else. That's selfie culture, that's diversity for the sake of diversity, that's wrong. And after a great deal of consideration, I have come to this conclusion:
If that's what you think, you can go fuck yourself.
That's not politic, and it's not nice, and it may cause a couple of people to go "what a bitch, I'm done," but I don't fucking care. Because I am tired of people needing to thank me for making an effort. I am tired of receiving email that says it was distracting when so-and-so turned out to be gay, or asking why I have Indian characters in three separate series (and the fact that having an Indian woman show up and never speak a line is apparently enough to put Indexing on the same level as Blackout for some people just makes me weep for humanity). I am tired of "oh you feel like you're so open-minded" because I write about gay people, bi people, poly people, people who are exactly like the people that I know. I want to be unremarkable for my casting choices, and only remarkable for my characters being awesome (because let's face it, my characters are awesome).
A lack of representation in fiction leads to a lack of self-esteem, because selfie culture is important: we need to see ourselves, and the people who keep trying to dismiss that as somehow selfish or greedy or narcissistic are the ones who've had a mirror held up to them for so long that they don't even see it anymore. White becomes so generic, so default, that it's not mentioned when describing a character ("blonde hair, blue eyes" vs. "oh, she's black, of course, that's the biggest thing"). Humanity is huge and diverse and amazing, and saying that only a small, approved sliver of it belongs in fiction is a dick move. If diversity is distracting, it's because it's so rare.
We can fix that.
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →
December 6 2013, 16:37:00 UTC 3 years ago
December 7 2013, 23:26:52 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 16:41:01 UTC 3 years ago
December 7 2013, 23:27:02 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 16:51:13 UTC 3 years ago
December 7 2013, 23:27:13 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 16:51:17 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:55:39 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 16:55:32 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:55:47 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 16:55:44 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:56:33 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:18:53 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:56:44 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:19:10 UTC 3 years ago Edited: December 6 2013, 17:19:45 UTC
December 8 2013, 07:10:50 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:25:41 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:57:06 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:26:43 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:57:17 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:40:59 UTC 3 years ago
The claim "diversity is distracting" is so telling. What is it distracting them from? "Waiter, there's a black person in my default-white SF!"
When I was reading the pieces that led to all this, the most infuriating thing was the idea that any "diverse" characters need to have historical background/justification in order to be in the story. They need a reason to exist. That's telling, too. Why don't the white characters need a reason or a historical background to justify their existence? Why don't the male characters need a reason to be in the story?
If these people had the self-awareness to examine the context of what they're saying... *sigh* *burn*
December 9 2013, 15:57:46 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:42:13 UTC 3 years ago
Yesterday George Takei posted on his Facebook an interview with Nichelle Nichols, in which she was ready to resign from Star Trek because she kept getting written out of shows. A zealous Trekkie came and implored her to remain with the show, because what she was doing was so important that she should not abdicate her role. That self proclaimed Trekkie was Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. He told her that the images we see, for good or ill, become part of who we are and what is normal to us.
Keep writing it until it is normal.
December 6 2013, 23:38:29 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 17:45:32 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:58:12 UTC 3 years ago
Deleted comment
December 6 2013, 19:14:08 UTC 3 years ago
Deleted comment
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:04:27 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:58:39 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:06:17 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 19:17:03 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:10:09 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:59:17 UTC 3 years ago
<3
December 6 2013, 18:22:25 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:59:28 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:35:26 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 19:20:26 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:41:40 UTC 3 years ago
December 9 2013, 15:59:47 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:43:35 UTC 3 years ago
December 10 2013, 16:58:39 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:43:51 UTC 3 years ago
December 10 2013, 16:58:48 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:45:29 UTC 3 years ago
December 10 2013, 16:59:00 UTC 3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:45:32 UTC 3 years ago
If someone is writing an urban fantasy, diversity does belong there, because our cities are filled with diverse people. If someone is writing a secondary world fantasy, diversity belongs there, too, because many cultures interacted through the centuries, and differing sexual orientations did not 'begin' in just the past few decades. Harbors, marketplaces, castes, borderlands--all offer the opportunity for people of different backgrounds and cultures to interact, and come into conflict, which is great for a story. If it's distracting, I wonder if it's because the reader is getting too wrapped up in expecting the characters to make as big a deal about a diverse cultural or sexual background as he/she (the reader) is, and the characters aren't.
I have to mention The Spiritwalker Trilogy by Kate Elliott. It's secondary world (alternate history, sort of, with magic) epic fantasy, and nearly every character is a character of color. They have different backgrounds (Phoenician, Afric, Celtic, etc.), and that diversity is just a matter of course.
December 6 2013, 19:10:00 UTC 3 years ago
I started a long rant, but actually, it boils down to: I want to see people like the people around me in the stories I read. And people who are different, and some sense that if your world has a big ol fundamental difference, like zombies or dragons, or spacetravel, that has affected social patterns, but hasn't obliterated the old ones. Because why would it?
H
3 years ago
3 years ago
December 6 2013, 18:55:52 UTC 3 years ago
So tell me, if I'm writing a story true to the college life I experienced at that time, how can it be anything BUT diverse?
Of course, that's college. High school should be more homogeneous, right?
My hs was more than 50% black, I had a wicked bad crush on a Jewish boy, one year we had a transfer student from Turkey, I can remember being amused by a younger schoolmate whose name was Yung Man (Korean, iirc). My circle of friends at the time included four homosexuals (3 male, one female - I had a bit of a pash on her, she was gorgeous).
Ironically, my older sister, one academic year above me, had that homogeneous non-diverse scholastic experience that is supposedly the norm. We did go to the same school. We just didn't see the same things.
December 6 2013, 22:25:28 UTC 3 years ago
3 years ago
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →