Seanan McGuire (seanan_mcguire) wrote,
Seanan McGuire
seanan_mcguire

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Characters, criteria, and causation: where the problem lies.

Friday, The Zoe-Trope posted a really interesting piece titled "Real Girls, Fake Girls, Everybody Hates Girls," which I highly recommend that you go and read before you continue with this post. It's both the background material for some of these thoughts, and more importantly, it's a really solid, thoughtful article about the issues that we, communally, are having with female characters right now. She also coined the lovely term "Sarah Jane" as the opposite of "Mary Sue": an ordinary, flawed, perfectly reasonable character who doesn't warp the universe around her.

Meanwhile, the New Statesman has posted an article titled "I Hate Strong Female Characters," taking the position that male characters are allowed to be flawed, complex, and infinitely interesting, while female characters are expected to stop at "strong." Woo! That character is strong! Flawless feminist writing!

Groan.

I've talked before about the concept of "the Mary Sue," and why I think she is both unfairly maligned and non-existent. You can find that post here, which I think officially makes this the post with the most "required background reading" thus far this year. A lot of people have pointed this out recently—it is not an original thought—but I'm going to put it here anyway, because I think it's salient:

1. Mary Sue is the best she is at what she does.
2. Mary Sue has a mysterious and tortured past, and is probably an orphan.
3. Mary Sue is physically attractive.
4. Mary Sue is either rich or somehow never has a problem with money.
5. Mary Sue develops powers to suit the situation, because she always wins, unless she needs to lose for the sake of beautiful angst.
6. Mary Sue doesn't have to follow the rules of the story she's in. Ergo...
7. Batman and Wolverine are both Mary Sues.

(Pointing this out to people who are piously explaining how only female characters can be Mary Sues, because only female characters are ever that unrealistically written, is hysterical. And by "hysterical," I mean "a really good way to get yelled at by enraged nerds who don't want to admit, even a little bit, that their magical dick-lords could be just as much wish-fulfillment as all those violet-eyed sixteen-year-old ensigns flying starships.")

So. Let us begin.

October "Toby" Daye was in many ways my first "real" protagonist. She was complicated, she was sad, she was bruised and refusing to break, and she was not afraid to put her duty ahead of her desire to be liked. She bullied her way through the world she was created to inhabit, looking at every complication that stood in her way and saying "No, you move." After a lifetime spent moving dolls through stories, it was like I finally had a real person to follow and document. I started writing her adventures, and sending them out to people I trusted to read and review. Midway through either the second or the third book—I don't remember anymore—I got a note from one of my proofers saying "You can't have Toby do this, she's always been a little bitchy, but this makes her a total bitch. No one will like her if she does this."

I panicked. I couldn't write a series about an unlikeable character! I'd never get published, no one else would ever meet my imaginary friends, and everything I'd worked for my whole life would be over, all because Toby was unlikeable.

Then I took a deep breath, and wrote back to the proofer requesting that they do a find/replace on the .doc, and plug in the name "Harry Dresden" for every instance of "October Daye." They did, and lo and behold, what had been "bitchy" and "inappropriate" was suddenly "bold" and "assertive." A male character in the same situation, with the same background, taking the same actions, was completely in the right, justified, and draped with glory. He was a hero. Toby? Toby was an unlikeable bitch.

The proofer withdrew the compliant. I have never forgotten it.

Female characters are expected to be perfect without being perfect, a contradiction that is as nonsensical as it is impossible. There's a full list in the article I linked above ("I Hate Strong Female Characters"), but these are the ones that really frustrate me. Female characters have to be:

* Thin and conventionally pretty, but eat only junk food/eat constantly, and never, ever worry about gaining weight;
* Incredibly sexy but unaware of their own sexuality ("You don't know you're beautiful!").
* TOTALLY SURPRISED when a push-up bra or pair of leather pants changes the way people look at them.
* Convinced that every woman around them is a bitch, slut, or whore.

That last one...yeah. See, there's this huge narrative of "I'm not like the other girls" that runs through a lot of these critiques, and it's not "I'm not like..." the way that, say, Harry Potter is not like the other wizards in his year group. No, it's "You Belong With Me"-level "she wears high heels, I wear sneakers" shit, totally denying that the other girls could have anything of value to bring to the conversation. It's like being a member of the Disney Princess collection. You can't let those other princesses steal your spotlight, no! Ignore them, shame them, refuse to make eye contact. Call a girl who wears the same thing you do a skank, it's okay. Call a girl who's had two boyfriends a slut, even as you dance at the center of your own love pentagon. It's all fine, because you're not like those other girls. By creating a single focal point of "not like" that it's okay to care about, you place the rest of the world's female humans in a box labeled "icky." Not-like girls are great. They're strong female characters, they kick ass and take names and eat cheeseburgers and don't give a damn what the world thinks of them. All other girls are gross.

The amount of slut-shaming, fat-shaming, you-name-it-shaming that I see coming from these "strong female characters" is horrifying, because it requires that othering aspect be front and center. Your character must be above reproach, and since everyone knows that women are disgusting, horrifying, alien skin lizards wearing pretty makeup and hair dye to deceive and entrap men, she can't be like them. She can never be like those other girls.

I flip out when I meet a female character who's allowed to have female friends, because it's so damn rare. The upcoming Disney film, Frozen, has sisters in it. Sisters. Who get to be the same age and talk and stuff. I am ecstatic, because even if the movie turns out to be a sack of problematic eels, we got sisters on the goddamn screen, and that's even rarer than friends.

Where does this come from? Well, in part, it comes from the things we surround ourselves with. Books and movies where the Smurfette Principle is in full effect, which means that one woman must stand in for all women, and thus can't have a personality beyond "the girl." Series where you have the one sensible, sympathetic female, and every other female character is there to cause trouble or gasp no oh no panic, steal her man. Series where the female characters are killed off to further male pain, or because the male characters are "easier to write" (a statement that often matches up to an all-male writer's room).

It needs to stop.

Female characters should be people. Flawed, glorious, interesting, enthralling people. Let them dye their hair and pierce their ears without going "wah wah wah I'm so bad at being a girl wait hey look suddenly I've gotten a makeover and I'm gorgeous." Let them have female friends. Let them fuck up. Let them have bad days, and swear, and be snotty, and be people. Stop shoving them into these boxes where anything less than perfect adherence to a set of ticky-boxes means failure. They are better than that. We are better than that.

It's time for everybody's standards to look the same.
Tags: contemplation, cranky blonde is cranky, writing
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 188 comments
I want to frame this. Thank you.
And thank you for Toby and May and the Luidaeg and Luna and....
This story about this Proofer really baffles me, there isn't even a second where I thought that Toby acted "bitchy", she is just...Toby? A Person? Who has to deal with a lot of shit? Who is awesome?

@ Sisters and Friends
A reason why I'm happy I stumbled over "Earth Girl". It's YA, it's SciFi and it has a female protagonist whose BFF is a girl. She wants to hate this other perfect girl because she is perfect, but she just can't and all the troupes I know from other books are pointed out and twisted into something great. No slut-shaming, no fat-shaming, no shaming at all and I'm so angry that this is so rare (especially with YA speculative fiction) that I'm acting like I found a treasuere chest. How sad is that?

mariadkins

August 20 2013, 21:54:50 UTC 3 years ago Edited:  August 20 2013, 21:57:27 UTC

it makes me wonder where this all goes back to, and it's something i think about a lot.

because it seems as girls/women, we learn at a very early age that the only way to make it through our lives is to cut other girls/women around us to absolute pieces. we don't support each other. we don't lift each other up. we grind each other into the mud and use those we've knocked over as stepping stones in the process of going on and not looking back.

i've seen boys cut each other down - and they've always usually been laughing and smiling the entire time; "it's okay bro, we're cool". but i've never seen them treat each other the way girls treat other girls. though i could be horribly wrong. but i have always had more male friends than female friends. (but in truth, i just won't allow myself around anyone, regardless of chromosomes, who treats other people that poorly, and most of the girls/women i've ever known have been downright cruel in many ways)

why and how did we ever start behaving like this?
I always had more female friends than male friends. I'm cool with men (I love my roleplaying group, though the only people I'm really close with are the other two gals one being my BFF I "dragged" into the group), but there are so many topics I'm more comfortable sharing with a fellow gal.
But I know that this is because I grew up free of this shit until High School. Even in elementary school there wasn't really an issue with girls treating girls differently than boys treating boys, most of the time we did all the games together (girls catching boys and the other way round was very popular *gg*).

The thing is...my BFF and I only know each other via another girl. We three did a vacation together and for a lot of reasons it resulted in us two falling out with the other girl (some time after the vacation, but the vacation was one of the reasons) and becoming best friends. Years after that I once read somewhere on the web that the only reason why girls can be friends is via antipathy against another girl. It's stupid, because this falling out was nasty, but it didn't happen because we started to hate the other girl, it was just bad timing and misunderstandings and the girl being super jelious. And I mean, obviously it's possible to be friends with two other gals and doing stuff together or different stuff in pairs, I do it all the time.

Plus society thinks that a bunch of women working together are bound to be bitchy and cruel to each other and of course this'll become a self-fullfilling prophecy. It's the reason why I dread working solely with women, because it got hammered into our skull that female coworkers are bitchy and cruel, nevermind the three years I worked in a store with five other women where I had one of greatest times of my life. It still doesn't change my mindset and I loathe this fact.
1997-1999, for three springs January to May, I worked in a very small H&R Block office in the Kentucky mountains. Each spring there were five to six of us women in the office. We all got on like a house on fire. Great times and we all still keep in touch. :)

And that, honestly, is likely the post "woman positive" time I've ever had.
You are so welcome.