annoyedI got half of what I wanted: I got air conditioning. I will be as spoiler-free as I can, but I am unhappy.
The setup of the movie is thus: four magicians, all of whom are awesome in their solo acts, are Recruited To Do Something. This isn't a spoiler; it's the premise, which leads to them teaming up and being awesome and also robbing banks and shit (all in the trailers). We have a mentalist, a classic slight-of-hand trickster, an escape artist, and a pickpocket/misdirectionist. As they start to do their shit, they are pursued by an FBI agent, an Interpol agent, a professional debunker, and a dude who got robbed.
Of the characters listed above, two are female. They never speak to each other. No, never. No, not even then. There are two secondary female characters, who also never speak to each other (one is there purely to be a pretty status symbol). The female magician is the only one who never gets an awesome moment where her field of magic, her specialization is both key to the plan and saves the day. Literally the first thing one of the other magicians says to her is "you're pretty."
YOU'RE PRETTY.
Now here's the thing: while I disagree that some roles are particularly "gendered," I can accept that right now, in our current media climate, you will want at least 75% of your romances to be between characters of opposite genders. I don't like it, but I will roll with it. And that being said, there was not a single fucking character in this movie who needed to be male. Make the smug team leader a girl, and make the ex-girlfriend an ex-boyfriend! Make the action character a girl (I basically spent every moment one of the magicians was on screen wishing he would turn into Beth Reisgraf). Make more than one important member of your team a fucking female.
And we now stand, again, at the edge of one of my biggest complaints about media today: a team with three men and one women wasn't seen as imbalanced, but the opposite team would have been. It's very possible that even a two-and-two team would have been seen as dominated by women. I am not calling for gender equality in every movie. I saw The Fast and the Furious 6 earlier this month; it was male-dominated, and it was fantastic. Not without its issues—what is?—but well-balanced, casting-wise, with multiple interesting, nuanced female characters who were allowed to interact.
When I go on these "why was so-and-so a guy" rants, someone always says "would you have this complaint if the cast were exactly gender reversed?", and I always say no. I still say no. Because there are so many male-dominated action movies and caper flicks and summer blockbusters that adding a few female-dominated examples would not be "reverse discrimination," it would be balancing the backlog. What I really want is gender neutrality. I want a team of two girls and two guys robbing banks with slight-of-hand and being awesome, rather than another movie that reduces me to a prize or a non-entity.
It's exhausting being this unhappy all the time.
The media won't let me stop.
June 9 2013, 05:57:57 UTC 4 years ago Edited: June 9 2013, 05:59:17 UTC
I only see maybe one or two movies a year, but I'm a die-hard Trekkie, even enough to tolerate the "reboot"; so, as long as we're re-casting movies to eliminate gender stereotypes... why couldn't Khan have been female?
Deleted comment
June 9 2013, 13:44:28 UTC 4 years ago Edited: June 9 2013, 13:52:44 UTC
But I understand that they cast pale-skinned, blond Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan in order to teach us that a person's name is not necessarily related to their physical appearance. So maybe they could have cast Alice Eve as Khan. Although that would have made it awkward to squeeze in the fanservice underwear scene :-D (Hey, that's not a spoiler - it was floating around on the 'net for months before the movie opened.)
As a mostly-heterosexual female, I did greatly appreciate seeing Zack Quinto and Benedict Cumberbatch running around in tight-fitting black clothing... but now the thought of either or both of them in their underwear has me all verklemt...
June 9 2013, 13:55:12 UTC 4 years ago Edited: June 9 2013, 13:56:30 UTC
(All they needed was one over-attentive history student spotting Khan on the street, if they'd gone without the cosmetic surgery...)
I thought that the shuttle scene with Kirk and Carol - and the direct cut to Carol and McCoy next scene - made a pretty good point about Carol's refusal to commit suicide by working with people who can't keep their minds on what they're supposed to be doing...and Jim's willingness to accept the (unspoken) rebuke.
(Granted that I may be giving too much credit to the production team here.)
June 10 2013, 10:34:48 UTC 4 years ago
That whirring sound you hear is Gene Roddenberry spinning in his grave... (or he would be if he hadn't been cremated). Still, I went back for a refill on my popcorn :-)
June 10 2013, 11:07:24 UTC 4 years ago
We never did get to see original'verse Carol's first meetings with Kirk, although novelists have tried to work out the circumstances on several occasions.
June 11 2013, 03:45:54 UTC 4 years ago
July 29 2013, 15:37:48 UTC 3 years ago
Yes.
July 30 2013, 08:41:43 UTC 3 years ago Edited: July 30 2013, 08:51:18 UTC
I mean, if they're genetically perfect superhumans, a superwoman ought to be just as able to kill even a relatively strong ordinary human with her bare hands, leap and/or fall improbable distances without injury, pilot a spaceship with preternatural skill and reflexes, and resurrect dead tribbles. Without showing us her underwear.