PERSON #1: "Here are my eligible works!"
PERSON #2: "That's crass and inappropriate!"
PERSON #1: "But...how else am I supposed to make sure people know what's actually eligible?"
PERSON #2: "SILENT HATEFUL MAGIC."
(I always get Ursula from The Little Mermaid in my head right about now. "You'll have your looks! Your pretty face! And don't underestimate the importance of body language...")
This was followed by the second loop of the award argument:
PERSON #2: "I will never ever ever ever vote for or nominate someone who announces they're eligible."
PERSON #1: "But...that just penalizes the people you know about."
PERSON #2: "I KNOW ALL THINGS."
PERSON #1: "What about conversations in bars? Isn't it better to be upfront and public?"
PERSON #2: "ALL THINGS."
Cue the Sea Witch.
So here, then, is the big conundrum of authors during award season: If we say "I am eligible, and here is what I am eligible for," we get people complaining about crass, inappropriate self-promotion, no matter how gently we word it. If we say nothing at all, we get people complaining about how we didn't remind them about our eligibility, with a side order of "why didn't you make sure I knew nominations were open in the first place." In short, we cannot win for losing. So which option causes more unhappiness? Which option is more problematic, in the long run?
In this case, I'm going to say...silence. Because here's the thing: the only way a zero promotion model works is if there is genuinely zero promotion. If one person with a lot of friends makes an off-hand comment in a bar, that can change everything, especially with as narrow a margin as most fannish awards tend to have—and yes, that includes the Hugos and the Nebulas. Since zero promotion is impossible to enforce, the best option is for everyone who cares about the horses they have in the race to say, publicly, politely, and without hiding behind the veil of anonymity, "I am eligible for these things, in these categories, thank you for considering me, please remember to consider all the worthy works from this past year."
I have horses in this year's race. So do an enormous number of my friends, and an enormous number of authors and creators who are not friends of mine, but whose work I respect and admire. And I genuinely want to see the ballot reflect what we, as a community, think, not what I think, or what Bob thinks, or what Bob's fifty friends who he took out for drinks last Friday night might think. I want us to be global, and that means sometimes, creators will need to open their mouths and say "I am eligible." There's no shame in that. Saying it every day for a month, on the other hand, will get me slapping you in the back of the head with a tentacle.
Just saying.
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →
January 4 2012, 17:07:47 UTC 5 years ago
I don't understand people who react as if you did something wrong.
January 4 2012, 17:11:48 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:13:42 UTC 5 years ago
5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:14:40 UTC 5 years ago
I, for one, really appreciate when authors (or other creators, award depending) post a "these are the things I am eligible for" sort of list, because I can greatly enjoy a book but the likelihood that I'll remember when it was published or what the eligibility window is for any given award is much smaller.
The kind of self-promotion that does make me twitch is the vote-requesting type ( where the creator exhorts their readers to "please go vote for my stuff because you know me and we're fwendz", and worse does it many many times) but I have NEVER seen you do that kind of post.
January 4 2012, 17:20:03 UTC 5 years ago
(PS: Sherlock Holmes would kick both their asses.)
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
Deleted comment
January 4 2012, 17:47:58 UTC 5 years ago
Deleted comment
January 4 2012, 17:48:10 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:17:27 UTC 5 years ago
Even when it was my full-time job to keep track of what was coming out over the course of the year I don't think I managed more than about 80% coverage.
These days I struggle to get the time to read even a single book or a handful of short stories, so the notice is even more appreciated.
I'm surprised to not find a wiki or googledoc or something that compiles these. At least, a cursory search didn't turn one up.
Anyway, thank you for your list - I believe the very minor self-promotion squick is vastly overwhelmed by the "useful service to the community" it represents.
January 4 2012, 17:51:42 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:22:10 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:35:44 UTC 5 years ago
Come awards season, when lots of authors are posting about this kind of thing, that's what can get a little weird -- it's like a blend of being exhorted toward People's Choice-type awards and seeing behind the curtain on For Your Consideration Oscar campaigns. ;) It does help to know what's what, since I'm sure a lot of us would like to pitch in where we can.
5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:25:19 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:54:12 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:40:21 UTC 5 years ago
NOT SO MUCH thanks for the ear worm. I really did NOT need to know that I have that song memorized. Really...
January 4 2012, 17:54:25 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:44:12 UTC 5 years ago
The sensible approach (from both sides) is "have some class."
We know if you're only here to promote yourself (you're obviously not) vs genuinely engaging.
Similarly, there's an obvious distinction between "here is my self-proclaimed best work, everyone should vote for it!" and "here is what I wrote last year and here are the awards; if you think something's worthy of an award, I'd like it if you voted for it."
On the reader/voter side, vote genuinely (and for the serious awards, try to judge everything in the category before you vote), and don't spam-promote or castigate an author for sensibly promoting him or herself.
January 4 2012, 17:54:43 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:44:23 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:54:55 UTC 5 years ago
This is Beth Agreeing, Verbosely
January 4 2012, 17:55:54 UTC 5 years ago
And that would be BAD.
So I'm all for self-promotion in whatever dose the author wishes to provide. Though, preferably, stylish self-promotion; I will probably object if someone uses flashy-sparkle text to do it. But hey, I can stop reading that blog if there's too much flashysparkle, y'know?
January 4 2012, 18:06:31 UTC 5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:55:56 UTC 5 years ago
I have been informed by a friend that something I would been willing to bet a lot on happening last year happened this summer.
My ability to figure out what someone would be eligible for would be nonexistent. And I know I am not the only one who has this kind of problem, I have met others like me.
January 4 2012, 21:39:14 UTC 5 years ago
A list like this is a comfort, convenience, and generally a polite kind thing to offer the temporally-challenged.
5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:58:55 UTC 5 years ago
In a fair and just world, that would happen, but we don't live in a fair and just world, so generally speaking she gets stepped on.
There is nothing wrong with politely pointing out the work you've done in the past year that's eligible and making your argument for why it should be seriously considered in the framework you just outlined. As my father likes to put it, "No ask, no get. If could read minds, would be billionaire. Am not billionaire. Therefore cannot read minds, so ask nicely."
This seems sensible. I try to live by it. This occasionally gets me called assertive in tones that indicate it's meant as an insult, to which I go, "Nyaaah" and don't lose sleep.
January 4 2012, 18:12:19 UTC 5 years ago
Your father is Zathras? :-) Seriously, though, can I add that to my quote file? It's a wonderful statement.
Also, Seanan, I think your degree and format of self-promotion falls squarely into the "appropriate" category.
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
January 4 2012, 17:59:10 UTC 5 years ago
I'm just bummed out that I'm not eligible to vote for anything (not a Worldcon member, etc.).
January 4 2012, 18:05:22 UTC 5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
My take
January 4 2012, 18:07:31 UTC 5 years ago Edited: January 4 2012, 18:13:16 UTC
As such I appreciate people posting "this is eligible". Yesterday after checking some favorite author, publisher, & fan sites I had a list I took to the library to see what they had, or could get through inter-library loan.
So for me "this is eligible" posts are necessary. Thank you for yours.
January 5 2012, 16:11:54 UTC 5 years ago
Deleted comment
January 5 2012, 16:12:09 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 18:23:09 UTC 5 years ago
that aside, 'look what i wrote!' is part of your job as an author - if you dont publicise your work, esp here in your blog, people might not realise it exists. and book sales = happy Seanan :)
er. i might be rambling.
January 5 2012, 16:12:22 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 18:30:45 UTC 5 years ago
As for mentioning your work being ill mannered or whatnot - I think you can tell people like that to kiss your crass... awards help sell books, and selling books pays bills, and I reckon you've got just as many bills as the rest of us.
January 5 2012, 16:12:48 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 18:40:28 UTC 5 years ago
January 5 2012, 16:13:01 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 18:47:13 UTC 5 years ago
Best Novel:
http://www.doodle.com/3xav2v6tgw9bp7cu
Best Short Story.
http://www.doodle.com/pe667ggxzq4wtfa7
January 9 2012, 16:07:31 UTC 5 years ago
Deleted comment
January 4 2012, 19:35:39 UTC 5 years ago
5 years ago
5 years ago
Deleted comment
January 9 2012, 16:08:53 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 19:27:37 UTC 5 years ago
My happy medium is mentioning the things by others that I really liked and that are eligible.
January 9 2012, 16:09:39 UTC 5 years ago
January 4 2012, 20:43:08 UTC 5 years ago
January 9 2012, 16:10:43 UTC 5 years ago
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →