Seanan McGuire (seanan_mcguire) wrote,
Seanan McGuire
seanan_mcguire

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Pimp my website, win an ARC!

So here's the deal. I have two websites, and I maintain them both myself, manually. That means nothing changes unless I go in and change it. The sites are here:

http://www.seananmcguire.com/
http://miragrant.com/

Parts of these sites are quite out of date, because I have been a busy little bee. We are thus going to play a little game.

Step 1: Go to my website. Either one.
Step 2: Poke around until you see something that could use improvement. A typo, a missing link, an unclear question on the FAQ, even a missing question on the FAQ. (Pages that aren't linked at all, like the Field Guide, or don't exist, don't count. Those are future improvements, not current issues.
Step 3: Post here, suggesting a correction/update.
Step 4: Step away from the website.

I will be making updates and corrections, partially based on this post, for the next week. On Friday, I will use our friend, random number generator, to choose a winner of an ARC of One Salt Sea (US-only, unless you can help with postage). No matter what, everybody benefits, since the end result should be an easier-to-use website.

Game on!
Tags: giving stuff away, one salt sea, requesting things, shameless plea, toby daye, website updates
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 102 comments

mneme

August 8 2011, 22:10:33 UTC 5 years ago Edited:  August 8 2011, 22:12:40 UTC

Hmm. Could you change the hierarchy and then link to the sub-headings?

(e.g., put all the icons under Icons rather than breaking things down by book and use http://miragrant.com/wallpapers.php#feedi, and all the wallpapers under Wallpapers and use http://www.miragrant.com/wallpapers.php#feedw--or more likely use anchors that weren't book specific for the top level anchors).

Or even keep the hierarchy the same and link to the top level content (that is, the books) rather than the sub level. But it seems like that would be a bigger maintenance headache over time.
No.