Seanan McGuire (seanan_mcguire) wrote,
Seanan McGuire
seanan_mcguire

  • Mood:
  • Music:

Please don't be That Guy.

I thought fairly hard about whether or not to make this post, as I generally try not to say negative things that can't be veiled behind a lovely shimmering curtain of "no details here." In the end, I decided that the details I had were vague enough to be borderline-generic, with a few careful omissions. And this is an important "please don't be this guy."

On Sunday at Arisia, I was on a panel called "Fanfic As Writer's Workshop," for discussion of how the skills and techniques learned from writing fanfiction can be applied to writing original fiction. (Yes, Virginia, you can learn how to write by writing fanfic. But that is another post for another day.) I was, at the time, incredibly sick, due to exposure to mango (which I am highly allergic to), but I was determined to soldier through. It's probably a good thing that I was as sick as I was, since it prevented my becoming annoyed enough to shout. See? Vomiting has value!

The panel consisted entirely of women (myself, three other writers, and Diana). The room, while small, was quite well-filled, with a nice mix of people who wanted to discuss learning about writing through, well, actually writing. And, in the front row, was That Guy. He was fairly large; fairly unkempt; had not brushed his hair; appeared to be wearing basic black for its stain-concealing properties, rather than out of any goth sympathies; and was, when first sighted, vigorously picking at his teeth.

Please don't be That Guy, part one: If you're sitting in the front row of a panel, in full view of the panelists, please don't pick your teeth. If you must pick your teeth, please use a toothpick, or something, rather than using your fingers. We'd really rather not watch.

The panel began with enthusiasm, as each panelist explained their views on our topic, and we began taking questions from the attendees. That Guy stopped picking his teeth, which was a mercy, and began, instead, picking his ear. With the same finger.

Please don't be That Guy, part two: Sometimes we have itches. I get that. I, too, am an itchy person. But if you're sitting in the front row of a panel, and have already been seen to be picking your teeth, please do not stick the same finger in your ear. It makes the panelists very uncomfortable.

More questions from the audience. This is the point at which That Guy began truly interacting. "How do I get more readers for my fanfic?" he asked. "I wrote an alternate universe [SHOW] [SEASON], where instead of [MAN] killing [WOMAN], he rapes her."

Cue horrified silence. The fanfic community is largely female, for better or for worse, and that sort of statement is rarely going to go over well in mixed company. Diana, who was by that point far more diplomatic than I, tried pointing this out, along with the note that maybe, if he wanted people to trust him writing about rape, he needed to get them to trust him writing about other things, first. He countered with the fact that he had received good feedback from women. We moved on as quickly as possible.

Later in the panel, the topic of porn came up. Porn is, after all, the stereotypical reason people write fanfic, and that's not entirely a bad thing. So all of these women are now saying the word "porn," with varying degrees of enthusiasm.

Please don't be That Guy, part three: If you think there is ANY CHANCE that you might become visibly aroused by live women saying the word "porn," please DO NOT sit in the front row at a panel on fanfiction. They're going to say it, and what's going to happen is going to happen, and then I'm going to have to fight the urge to eject you from the room.

That Guy attempted to drag the panel back to a recounting of the plot of his fanfic several times, to the point where I actually asked him "How is this relevant?" (If you've ever been on a panel with me, or attended a panel with me, you'll know that I'm not opposed to topic drift, so long as it remains interesting and vaguely tangential. If I'm the one shutting you down, it's because you're so far off topic that you're no longer even in the topic's time zone.)

So please. This is a plea for everyone, male and female, who attends conventions and goes to panels: Please don't be That Guy. Don't sit to take up three chairs, sticking fingers in your facial orifices, and try to engage women in discussions on how rape in literature is awesome and not inappropriate in the least. Don't look offended when the panelists don't want to hand the panel to you, so that you can tell us about your magnum opus and why we all need to read it. And please, please, don't be creepy. For the rest of the weekend, if I saw That Guy, I moved to another elevator.

Let's play nicely with the other fans, and only creep them out with their permission, okay? I've done my best to be general here, but this one specific incident really drove home why this is something that needs to be said. No one was touched, cornered, or specifically harassed, but I had three people who attended that panel tell me how uncomfortable That Guy made them. Beyond that, I know how uncomfortable he made me.

I'm just saying.

ETA: Because this has come up twice, and is hence distracting: "please don't take up three chairs" does NOT mean "please don't be fat at a panel." You may be as fat as you do or do not wish to be, and as long as you're happy and healthy, I'm happy for you. But as I say on a regular basis, your backpack does not deserve a chair of its own. Neither does your leg, unless you are injured and require elevation. Neither does your arm. And if you're taking a chair each for your leg, torso, and arm, you have perhaps crossed a line.
Tags: contemplation, cranky blonde is cranky, don't be dumb, in the wild, post-con
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 222 comments

1) Sharing details with the Arisia feedback team - whose job it is to hear this sort of feedback for issues that may be more major (actual specific harassment) or less major (some of the feedback inevitably include complaints about things like why certain program items even exist) - is hardly a public name-outing and lynching.


2) Some of what you wrote above sounds very similar to the same arguments used to derail womens' experiences, by telling us that we are over-reacting, over-reacting, "Oh that's just Bob, it's just his way", "oh, well geeks often don't have social skills", and similar stuff. Until there's a problem, and then it becomes "Why didn't you say anything before it became a problem???". I think palmwiz is being very responsible in askinf for feedback, and the way he has asked for feedback.
I am totally fine with people disagreeing with me, but have to say I get pretty angry when accused of shutting down womens voices.

I get to have an opinion. My opinion is simple, the guy was clearly a dork and it sounds like the panelisst did a decent job handling it and that with this entry Seanan has made a valid plea for no one to be "that guy". I simply don't agree with putting him on a list, but it's not my decision just my opinion and if folks want to then knock yourselves out.

The anger I am feeling now is because you, in disagreeing with me, are making hugs assumptions about my own experiences, knowlege and beliefs. I was raped at the age of 9. I was abused and worse by a partner again in my teens and I have sent my life helping women and children escape a cycle of violence and shame. I have never belittled the voices or realities of any man or woman and repeatedly in what I wrote above said that certainly if individuals felt those lines had been forward than report it. I don't get to decide where those lines or whether they have been crossed. I merely suggested we try and be a little compassionate as well because we could be dealing with an individual with serious mental health issues or even simply with someone who is just a jerk but not more than that. Again, I wasn't there so not my place to make the distinction. It makes me sad that another women would tell me that I am a collaborator because I have an opinion she disagrees with. I just wanted to caution folks to differentiate between creepy and actionable and to maybe temper judgement with kindness. Silly me.

Oh and not that it matters, but yes I am liberal in my politics, I am not Christian, I am pro human rights and I like small furry animals, unicorns and some zombies. I am fat, my family is multi-racial and um..can't think of any other shoeboxes I might get put in..but yeah, I don't eat kittens either.
Well, I think the other thing you seem to be missing is that 'Legally actionable' and 'we would prefer you not attend our convention' are not the same thing. I don't think anyone was talking about legal action unless he /actually did something illegal/ which he didn't in that panel.

On the other hand, some of that arguably comes under 'against the rules of the convention' which could mean that he be asked not to come to future ones or at least that someone from the concom needs to have a discussion with him about some of his inappropriate behavior.

I also have to say that I found your response, complete with invocation of McCarthyism and witch hunts and persecution to be rather extreme given what was actually asked. And somewhat stiffling as you were effectively telling people who were made very uncomfortable 'well, you shouldn't complain because you don't know what else is going on with him'. Because, as much as you may not have meant to do that, that is, actually, what you effectively did.
Utterly respectfully, Ms. Chase:

I do not see beable accusing you of shutting down womens' voices.

I do see beable using a simile to express her comparable point of view on the general topic of "being uncomfortable with a directive to NOT report inappropriate behavior".

I think that she is trying to explain her discomfort with your actual opinion on the A Topic by drawing parallels to a more clearly delineated but totally other scenario from history.

I think you are reacting to her disagreement by misreading what she actually wrote. Your hindbrain is throwing in an idea that beable has accused you of a particularly objectionable BadGuyness. You are then accusing her of thinking things about you -- your words: "you, in disagreeing with me, are making hugs assumptions about my own experiences, knowlege and beliefs" -- that her own words do not even indirectly indicate.

Yes, I unfortunately am now saying that you overreacted. I hate to see a sensible, insightful woman essentially say "my origin makes it unreasonable for anyone to say I am wrong".

***

For my own part, when I'm at a convention, I automatically presume that I'm there to learn and to help others learn; and anyone who starts a social interaction with me is there for the same reason, and therefore can reasonably be approached with, "Are you interested in some practice at recognizing and navigating social boundaries? I've learned how to tell when Topic Q will freak out a particular subgroup, and some of why, and how to not induce freaking, and would be happy to compare notes with you for a while."

But I've met some people of whatever gender who prefer that the world bend to accomodate them rather than the other way 'round, and those are people I would discreetly report to totient.