sickPoint the First: "Not everyone who illegally downloads your book would have bought it, so you shouldn't act like they would have."
True! That being said, I know enough people who have illegally downloaded books and then bought them, or have told me to my face (or via email) that they were planning to buy the book, only then got it for free, that I feel some consideration of the number of illegal copies is warranted. Just going off what I do know, I tend to assume about one person in ten represents a "lost sale." This accounts for new readers only, not people downloading copies of books they already own.
Point the Second: Downloading copies of books you already own is a morally gray area.
True. I completely understand and sympathize with people who download virtual copies of books they already own. Unfortunately, a) I don't own the e-book rights to my books right now, and thus can't say "sure, have a PDF with proof of purchase," and b) the methods for getting those downloads are non-legal. There's not a private literary speakeasy where you have to send in a photo of yourself with your legal physical copy before you get the download link. And so while I can understand the moral ambiguity of it all, I can't endorse the practice.
Point the Third: It's not piracy, it's copyright infringement.
Okay, true. For precision of language, I should call it copyright infringement. But the people who sometimes post intentionally inflammatory things on message boards aren't actually trolls, they're just being mean. In some cases, the prevailing language of the land is going to win out over precision. I apologize for any confusion.
Point the Fourth: "Does this mean you don't like me because I initially read your book in a sub-legal format?"
Did you buy the book? I mean, really, that's where my concern is here: In whether I can feed the cats. I first discovered the X-Men because my friend Lucy had an older brother who wasn't careful with his comics, and I didn't pay for those, either. As I said above, I can't condone illegal downloading, but once you've paid for the material, I lose all personal animosity.
Point the Fifth: Books and music aren't the same.
Most the research on illegal downloads has been in the music arena, and the numbers aren't the same. According to iTunes, the single song I have listened to the most often is the cover of "Livin' La Vida Loca" by Spork, which I have listened to 342 times. The single book I have read the most often is IT, by Stephen King, which I have read, if guessing generously, eighty times in the last twenty years. Many people don't re-read, or do so only sparingly. So saying that illegal downloads increase sales when you're only looking at music is like saying that breeding mice increases the elephant population.
Point the Sixth: Cory Doctorow does it.
Cory Doctorow is also recognized by my spellchecker, which doesn't recognize my name. He chose to distribute over the Internet, and it worked out awesomely for him. He's also doing Internet-savvy fiction, with a keen edge of interest for the online crowd. I write urban fantasies about women with silly names. We don't have the same target audience; it's mice and elephants again.
I'll come back and participate in the discussion more one on one later. Now? DayQuil and sleep.
November 5 2010, 00:31:26 UTC 6 years ago
A book that I have prior purchased in dead tree format and is NOT available in E-book format for sale but which I wish to read on my Kindle so as not to lug said dead-tree on a plane. An example of this would be the latest Ring of Fire hardback tome. I purchased a hardcover copy, placed it into a box and found a digital copy. I did this because the publisher has chosen at least for now not to make the book available in the Kindle store.
A piece of music which I had prior purchased in which the media has been damaged or rendered unusable. Example in this case, my CD copy of Disney Event Party music which I wanted for Halloween somehow got cracked. I was ok downloading a new copy in digital mode because I had purchased a copy fairly, in this case it is basically no different than if I had backed up the CD to PC (which I should have done)
Anything else, if I want it, I buy it.
November 5 2010, 01:39:37 UTC 6 years ago
November 5 2010, 06:35:49 UTC 6 years ago
Admittedly, none of the devices I use are INTENDED for use as e-readers.
I read e-books on my
Nintendo DS
Sony PSP
and my cell phone
(no apps available)
In all three cases, they will only take .TXT files.
Given that I already have these items, my desire to buy a dedicated e-reader is pretty much nil. Besides, I work nights, and bus home in the dark. An e-ink reader wouldn't work for me.
But to buy legit e-copies requires a mainstream e-reader.
November 5 2010, 15:49:18 UTC 6 years ago
November 5 2010, 21:25:41 UTC 6 years ago
(I want Velveteen in paperback dammit)
November 9 2010, 02:33:01 UTC 6 years ago
November 9 2010, 05:14:58 UTC 6 years ago
Saw this today at work, and immediately thought of you
http://gizmodo.com/5683410/calculate-ho
(You can file this under Research!)
November 11 2010, 17:24:16 UTC 6 years ago
November 5 2010, 19:08:43 UTC 6 years ago
Out Of Copyright
November 5 2010, 23:04:04 UTC 6 years ago
And this is why I advocated during last year's Canadian Copyright Consultation, that copyrights be non-transferrable, except by inheritance. Entities wishing to use the material for commercial gain would lease the material for a limited time, say five years, after which the author would be free to lease the material to another customer.
This would put control in the hands of the authors. Yes, I'm more than somewhat skeptical of corporations. I've had too many conversations with musicians who were screwed over badly by record labels, and who no longer control their own artistic output.
See Corporate Copyright Scofflaws 0006 – The RIAA Member Companies.
Again, not all companies are bottom feeding scum. Most print authors seem to like their publishers. But almost no one seems to like the CRIA/RIAA member companies except their employees.