Seanan McGuire (seanan_mcguire) wrote,
Seanan McGuire
seanan_mcguire
  • Mood: silly
  • Music: Glee, "Like a Virgin."

Taking the time machine for a spin.

Pop quiz time! Aliens (or mad scientists, or whatever) appear before you with a time machine, and tell you that you get to make two trips backward: one for your own personal gain, and one for the good of all mankind. Each trip can consist of several "hops" (so you can start by traveling back ten years, and then move forward two years, etc.), but can only include one backward hop, and can last for no more than twenty-four hours.

The rules:

1) You can bring anything you want to the past, but you can't leave anything behind. So you can't bring back the polio vaccine and start treating people. It wouldn't work.

2) You can't take anything forward with you, either, except for information. So you could, say, travel back with a copy of a book and a pen, and have the book signed with that pen. Or you could bring a camera and take pictures. But all things must be somehow made from materials you carried with you.

3) You can't get sick in the past, but you could be eaten by a T-Rex. No one native to the time periods you're visiting will notice anything odd about you.

For my personal use, I would pack a bunch of digital cameras, Flip video recorders, and a gene sequencer, and hop back to Messina in 1347. I would then document the Black Death in ten year jumps, with lots of photographs and recordings of people trying to breathe as they fully expressed the virus. And then, when I got back to the present, I would drive the CDC insane...but I would finally know for sure.

For the good of all mankind, I would hop back to the pre-tape losses BBC archives with a tape-to-DVD portable recording rig (and a technician), and get copies of all the missing Doctor Who serials. Upon returning to the present day, I would probably also get knighted.

So what's your personal use? And what's your use for the good of all mankind?
Tags: party games, silliness
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    switch
    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    Help
  • 120 comments
...go 1 level up... Expand

seanan_mcguire

April 23 2010, 06:08:51 UTC 7 years ago

Your choices entertain me all to heck.

hasufin

April 23 2010, 06:58:24 UTC 7 years ago

Well, I thought about going way back - you know, evolutionary time. It'd be something special to see which model accurately reflects biogenesis, and then step forward "slowly" to see how life really evolved, but...
1) As mentioned above, I accept that the practical limits of my own ability to run genetics research in the field is taking samples and throwing them in a PCR, which we haven't established to be workable anyway. Plus, genetics as we know it Just Won't Work on the really cool stuff.

2) Getting useful data is a truly gargantuan project. We're talking millions, if not billions, of data points. I'd die of old age before reaching this epoch.

3) THere's also this minor "lack of a breathable atmosphere" issue. The atmosphere as we know it is pretty new, and I'm not entirely confident we have environmental suits which can handle some possible prior scenarios.

So, human history.

And once humans get involved, there's an awful lot one can do to screw with their heads, y'know?