By page two, I was ready to fling the book across the room. Why? Because the author had chosen to scramble the spelling of a common-to-the-genre word in a way that made it look not only pretentious, but difficult to read. This is a personal bug-a-boo of mine, since I really do feel that spelling was standardized for a reason, and while I managed to soldier through, it colored my ability to sink into the text for several chapters.
(As an aside, seriously: not all words become more interesting and mysterious when spelled with a vestigial "y." The worst example I've ever seen was in a YA series full of "mermyds," and the fact that I made it through all three volumes is a testament to the power of raw stubborn.)
One reader of Rosemary and Rue posted a lengthy, positive review, more than half of which was taken up by complaints about the pronunciation guide. Specifically, I didn't write down the correct pronunciation of "Kitsune." It's a fair cop—if you pronounce the word as written in the pronunciation guide, you'll be saying it wrong—and it's been corrected for A Local Habitation, but it was, for this person, as bad as if I'd spelled Toby's name "Aughtcober" and then claimed it was pronounced just like the month. Bug-a-boos for all!
Kate recently delivered a long and eloquent diatribe on "back cover buzz-word bingo," which I really wish I'd had a video camera running for, because it was awesome. The summation is that she watches the back covers of books for certain "buzz-words," and, if the book works up to a magical bingo score, she doesn't read it. I do something similar with bad horror movies, since there are specific buzz-words that mean "soft core porn" and "gratuitous torture," and those really aren't what I'm watching the movie to see.
So what are your bug-a-boos? Terribly twisted spelling? Pronunciations that you don't agree with? Buzz-words oozing off the back cover and getting all over your shoes? How about heroines with ruby hair and emerald eyes who aren't appearing in an Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld fanfic epic? Inquiring blondes want to know!
November 3 2009, 17:15:07 UTC 7 years ago
Inconsistent use of real-world settings: if you put the legendary Powell's Books into a novel set in Portland, and call it Powell's, excellent. If you put a bookstore that is clearly Powell's into a novel set in Portland, and call it something else, I will be tempted to throw things. (I have no problem whatsoever with inserting imaginary businesses and locations into real-world settings; that's often necessary for plot purposes. But using a real-world setting and then renaming key landmarks? Defeats the purpose and undercuts the suspension of disbelief. This is one thing that Rosemary and Rue did exceptionally well, at least for me.)
Willfully stupid characters: given a first-person narrative in which the reader can figure out what's going on by chapter five, the fact that the first-person narrator doesn't figure it out until chapter thirteen is likely to be a capital-P Problem. I am thinking of one new/current urban-fantasy series in particular, in which the author tries to deal with this by introducing a really clever twist to the way magic works...except that the twist is never applied sufficiently or thoughtfully enough to actually make the conceit work.
November 3 2009, 18:54:42 UTC 7 years ago
I will make one note on the inconsistent use of real-world settings: sometimes you can't get permission/really need something that readers can visualize quickly, but don't actually want to blow up your favorite cafe. Big chunks of the seventh Toby book will be taking place in Borderlands Books, but if I hadn't been able to get Alan to okay using his bookstore, it would have been a totally made-up store that served essentially the same function.
November 3 2009, 19:36:41 UTC 7 years ago
November 4 2009, 03:56:08 UTC 7 years ago
November 4 2009, 15:01:06 UTC 7 years ago