By page two, I was ready to fling the book across the room. Why? Because the author had chosen to scramble the spelling of a common-to-the-genre word in a way that made it look not only pretentious, but difficult to read. This is a personal bug-a-boo of mine, since I really do feel that spelling was standardized for a reason, and while I managed to soldier through, it colored my ability to sink into the text for several chapters.
(As an aside, seriously: not all words become more interesting and mysterious when spelled with a vestigial "y." The worst example I've ever seen was in a YA series full of "mermyds," and the fact that I made it through all three volumes is a testament to the power of raw stubborn.)
One reader of Rosemary and Rue posted a lengthy, positive review, more than half of which was taken up by complaints about the pronunciation guide. Specifically, I didn't write down the correct pronunciation of "Kitsune." It's a fair cop—if you pronounce the word as written in the pronunciation guide, you'll be saying it wrong—and it's been corrected for A Local Habitation, but it was, for this person, as bad as if I'd spelled Toby's name "Aughtcober" and then claimed it was pronounced just like the month. Bug-a-boos for all!
Kate recently delivered a long and eloquent diatribe on "back cover buzz-word bingo," which I really wish I'd had a video camera running for, because it was awesome. The summation is that she watches the back covers of books for certain "buzz-words," and, if the book works up to a magical bingo score, she doesn't read it. I do something similar with bad horror movies, since there are specific buzz-words that mean "soft core porn" and "gratuitous torture," and those really aren't what I'm watching the movie to see.
So what are your bug-a-boos? Terribly twisted spelling? Pronunciations that you don't agree with? Buzz-words oozing off the back cover and getting all over your shoes? How about heroines with ruby hair and emerald eyes who aren't appearing in an Amethyst, Princess of Gemworld fanfic epic? Inquiring blondes want to know!
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →
November 3 2009, 15:55:44 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:45:29 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:04:23 UTC 7 years ago
November 6 2009, 14:56:49 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:05:12 UTC 7 years ago
Names that are too complex, unfamiliar, or otherwise difficult for me to remember and differentiate and keep track of, especially when there are a lot of characters or complex relationships/genealogies---I can't enjoy a book if I'm constantly forgetting whether Liriliessyn is Ilirnisswyn's sister or mother or former nursemaid or best friend or second-cousin-once-removed.
Yet-to-exist technology, slang, or renamed common items mentioned without sufficient context to let one figure out what they are. Tamora Pierce's Terrier series just barely avoided my wrath on this one, and was not completely without frustrated exclamations of "Peaches? Peaches!? Call them breasts and have done with it, honestly!"
November 3 2009, 17:09:50 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:13:54 UTC 7 years ago
I honestly can't get past cover art that is, in my opinion, ridiculously awful. I still haven't finished the Ghatti's Tale books by Gayle Greeno because I simply can't bring myself to purchase Exile's Return (the expression on the woman's face is appallingly off-putting on that cover). (To be fair, though, I bought many Wheel of Time books in spite of Darryl K. Sweet's awful covers because I was heavily invested in the story. I wasn't that invested in the Greeno books.)
Beyond that, I am wary of exclamation points (though this mostly applies to movie back-covers). If there are at least five exclamation points, you better put that down and edge away as if it were toxic waste. Unless you enjoy stupidity and hope that it falls into the so-bad-it's-awesome category.
November 3 2009, 17:11:16 UTC 7 years ago
I try to use as few exclamation points as possible, unless I'm taking dictation for the mice.
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:14:12 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:11:55 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:14:36 UTC 7 years ago
Also. Moon phases. I usually spend a week teaching college students the basics of celestial coordinates and the phase of the moon. This means I tend to notice when you have your new moon rise at midnight, or a crescent and full moon near one another in the sky. (Yes, for some reason, I can suspend disbelief long enough to read most SF with far worse science, but I'll bitch about moon phases.)
The fact that hero and heroine cannot be in a room together without getting distracted by sexy times. Or, really, the hero and heroine being attracted by one another and the narration* asserting this is True Love when all I see is 'They think the other one is sex on legs and fun in bed'.
I also hate the trend of showing the female protagonist from the chin down on covers. Mostly because all of them start to look alike, AND that I dislike what it says about the main character to not have her face visible, even in the sort of skulking in the shadows way.
I'm beginning to hate the trend of giving series books very similar names. I don't mind Jim Butcher's Dresden Files (all the books until the upcoming one have two word titles, often with a bit of a play on words), but I nearly missed the most recent book of Michelle Sagara because I confused Cast in Silence with Cast in Shadow, and I once had to run back to a bookstore to exchange Green Mars for Blue Mars. (Or maybe the other way around.)
* Assuming it is not the hero or heroine narrating, in which case, I can just add 'confuses infatuation with love' to character traits.
November 3 2009, 17:21:34 UTC 7 years ago
I get it about the moon phase—I have the exact same reaction to bad virology or bad animal physiology. I can suspend my disbelief as long as you're not messing with things your universe doesn't actually need to mess with. In Toby's world, the Summerlands have weird astrological behaviors, and Earth doesn't.
Apparently the whole "no face on the cover" thing is meant to allow you to further project yourself onto the heroine. Since I have a head, I find this difficult.
On the titles thing, yes, yes, a thousand times yes. I stopped reading Sookie Stackhouse because I honestly couldn't tell you where I left off.
November 3 2009, 16:14:48 UTC 7 years ago
Second is when the story is not self-consistent or doesn't operate under knowable rules. This one really gets me on stories which involve "magic realism", like Cien An~os de Solidad. Kicks my suspension of disbelief right out, and I can't enjoy a story that way.
Third is when the author loves Words and isn't so keen on having a Plot. Sure, there are good stories which take a while to get going, but if I'm a couple hundred pages in and it's all been "character development" and exposition, hell with it. I've seen books where it's 200+ pages before any of the main characters actually interact with each other.
November 3 2009, 17:22:57 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:17:50 UTC 7 years ago
Humans speaking stilted dialog that no one would ever say out loud.
Books where every character is a selfish, unlikeable clod. Conversely, heroes who are too perfect, always doing exactly the right thing for exactly the right reason.
Multiple points of view switching without warning within a single scene.
Stupidly bad science in what's supposed to be hard SF.
Endless (well, they feel that way) paragraphs of excruciatingly detailed description that do nothing to advance or enhance the story.
For everyone's amusement and horror:
The Thag-o-Matic.
The Eye of Argon.
November 3 2009, 17:49:12 UTC 7 years ago
Also, overly-perfect people make me want to punch them in the face.
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:20:25 UTC 7 years ago
There's a line in War For the Oaks about the Queen of Fairie having lips the color of cyclamen petals. Cyclamen comes in a dozen colors, so either the queen of Fairie has mood ring lips, or Emma Bull was unaware that cyclamen came in different colors. I had just been raising cyclamen (the red ones and some violet ones) either of which would have made a lovely lip color, but my involvement in the story was completely thrown by this detail, as I pondered which meaning was meant.
November 3 2009, 16:58:10 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:21:04 UTC 7 years ago
As for pronunciation guides, as a non-native English speaker with an approximate UK accent and with some training in phonetics, pronunciation guides like yours generally make me twitch, (more specifically when they occur in books like The Speech Chain, which is actually a Phonetics textbook that I quite liked in other respects). I suspect it's actually an American thing that I just have issues with, because it's so obviously geared towards everyday US speakers and those who aren't just have to... well, they're out of luck, really. But of course it occurs elsewhere too, I know. I guess I just love phonetic alphabets. ;-)
November 3 2009, 17:54:31 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:44:09 UTC 7 years ago
My mother feels exactly the opposite and thinks that the feelings of the author slow down and get in the way of the story, she especially hates stories told in first person, and any story that couldn't "really" happen.
Our libraries have very little overlap
November 3 2009, 17:54:43 UTC 7 years ago
Deleted comment
November 3 2009, 17:57:37 UTC 7 years ago
If there were real vampires, they'd probably think anyone under a size ten looked too close to dead to be worth risking.
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 16:50:28 UTC 7 years ago
I'm getting very tired of books where the main characters go all boinky after having just met. It didn't used to bother me but now that paranormal romance has become such a wide market it's way over used. Being a little floored or attracted to someone is one thing, but instant attract leading to naked fun in a character that's not presented as being rather slutty? Not too believable. I haven't thrown a book across the room for it yet but I've been come close a time or two.
A main character that's irresistible to anyone of the opposite (or sometimes the same) sex. Dude, people have types and your buxom redhead with tits out to here and lavender eyes or your mouthy, actively unpleasant at times petite brunette with the ultimate cosmic boinky undead powers isn't going to do it for everyone!
Lots more, probably, these are just the ones irritating me this morning ;-)
November 3 2009, 18:00:02 UTC 7 years ago
Also, yes! Yes, yes, yes. I hate it when every single man/woman in the book is helplessly in love with the MC. Dude, what? Half the population just doesn't want to do the other half. Sex doesn't work that way.
November 3 2009, 16:55:49 UTC 7 years ago
On the nose. I was reading Thendara House the other day and I noticed how many of the characters were redheads! Was the population on Darkover that inbred?
I also come down hard on languages that don't make sense, particularly when the people speaking them have Earth in their history. You don't come up with new languages out of the blue once you leave the planet. You work with what you've got. It adapts over time. Simple linguistic research!
And on that note, if a name does not make sense in a linguistic context, I will be tempted to throw the book against the wall. Toby's name is logical. The presence of very modern names in sword-and-sorcery makes me wince; if you're setting your fantasy in a medieval context, please have some justification for the presence of names that came from our literature, or worse, our pop stars.
-- Named Her Starship Captain "Vera"
Deleted comment
Deleted comment
7 years ago
7 years ago
Deleted comment
November 3 2009, 18:02:34 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:15:01 UTC 7 years ago
Really grievous unintentional spelling/grammar errors. I don't give up on an author for a typo now and then, but when the book is just FULL of errors, it takes me right out of the story. (More so since I joined the proofing pool, because now it's *habit* for me to look for those.) "How the hell did this get published without any editing?"
Making otherwise intelligent characters do something completely stupid solely for plot purposes. I suppose it's realistic enough (we *all* do stupid things now and then) but y'know, fiction has to make more sense than truth, I feel. Have a reason-- she was distracted by her brother's recent death, he was exhausted from not sleeping for two days, something. When there's no reason other than "so that we could have this other thing happen in the plot," then it just seems like cheating.
Plots, or major sections of plots, based SOLELY on misunderstanding. This is probably my biggest bug-a-boo; this is the one that will make me scream at the book or television, and raises my pulse just thinking about it. Entire lengthy strings of action leading to disastrous consequences that would all have been avoided if person A had imparted A SINGLE FACT to person B. Particularly when, in character, there's really no reason why person A *wouldn't* do so-- other than to have the Plot Points happen.
It's bad enough in romantic plots-- either the comical Three's Company "we thought they were having sex when really they were feeding the puppy!" type of plot, or the more tragic Jean M. Auel "he thought she was mad at him and she thought he didn't want her anymore when actually they both loved each other desperately but they went on to be miserably apart for forty-nine chapters because nobody would actually TALK TO EACH OTHER" type of plot. It's even worse in non-romantic plots; I can't think of a specific example, but the TV show Lost, though I love it dearly, is guilty of it a LOT. (I have found myself yelling "JUST TELL HIM ALREADY" at the TV screen more than once.)
November 3 2009, 17:49:28 UTC 7 years ago
Heh. I *do* have a character named "Maelqir" in an unfinished novel, in which the name is a derivation of Melchoir, one of the traditional Magi of the Christian Nativity. However, 1. the character's bastardization of a quasi-religious figure is deliberate on his part; and 2. he's perhaps the most pretentious of my characters, fond of considering himself a god when he's just a telekinetic. In middle management, yet.
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:15:07 UTC 7 years ago
Inconsistent use of real-world settings: if you put the legendary Powell's Books into a novel set in Portland, and call it Powell's, excellent. If you put a bookstore that is clearly Powell's into a novel set in Portland, and call it something else, I will be tempted to throw things. (I have no problem whatsoever with inserting imaginary businesses and locations into real-world settings; that's often necessary for plot purposes. But using a real-world setting and then renaming key landmarks? Defeats the purpose and undercuts the suspension of disbelief. This is one thing that Rosemary and Rue did exceptionally well, at least for me.)
Willfully stupid characters: given a first-person narrative in which the reader can figure out what's going on by chapter five, the fact that the first-person narrator doesn't figure it out until chapter thirteen is likely to be a capital-P Problem. I am thinking of one new/current urban-fantasy series in particular, in which the author tries to deal with this by introducing a really clever twist to the way magic works...except that the twist is never applied sufficiently or thoughtfully enough to actually make the conceit work.
November 3 2009, 18:54:42 UTC 7 years ago
I will make one note on the inconsistent use of real-world settings: sometimes you can't get permission/really need something that readers can visualize quickly, but don't actually want to blow up your favorite cafe. Big chunks of the seventh Toby book will be taking place in Borderlands Books, but if I hadn't been able to get Alan to okay using his bookstore, it would have been a totally made-up store that served essentially the same function.
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:16:44 UTC 7 years ago
- Long-winded made-up names and fancy titles bore me to the point of dropping the book.
- Flat characters that have no real personality. I need to really care about my characters. This is one reason I have never liked Larry Niven's books. Not only is he sexist but it's impossible for me to care about his characters. Heresy! There, I've said it!
- Well crafted plot is totally necessary. Meandering tales of many characters in an elaborate world just for the atmosphere just don't keep my attention. Yawn.
Well. I am looking forward to seeing what happens to Toby next. Now if I just had more time for reading...
November 3 2009, 18:55:50 UTC 7 years ago
Time is the enemy of us all.
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:21:06 UTC 7 years ago Edited: November 3 2009, 17:24:07 UTC
Spelling errors. I mean come on -- the book got published but not edited?
Needlessly convoluted language. I mean, I understand "show not tell", and that an author wants to paint a vivid image in a reader's mind, but sometimes economy of words less klunky. "She gathered her skirts in one hand, looked imperiously about, inspected the cushion for tacks, dust mites, imperfections of upholstery, and then, satisfied, she settled regally into the chair" could just as easily be "She inspected the chair; it met with her approval and she sat."
And the *Fever books right now are getting on my nerves. The heroine is a cutesy blonde forced to dye her hair black, and wear black when she'd prefer pastels. There's this whole sub-sub-sub plot about how she and her sister used made-up words in place of curse words, and she reiterates it at least a couple times a book. It was cute in the first book. I don't need that much recappage in the second book, so don't tell me how you're struggling to get past "Shut the frog up or I'll kick your petunia" so the big bad people you meet in Ireland will take you seriously.
That thing about exclamation points in another comment though -- I will remember that. I have tells in movie trailers that let me know whether to go see it or wait for it to hit cable. Quarantine showed (Dexter's sister) getting dragged into the dark in the trailer. I declared that the final shot of the movie at that point and it turned out to be right. If I can call it that accurately, they didn't put enough effort into the storytelling, IMO.
November 3 2009, 19:25:24 UTC 7 years ago
What the hell are these *Fever books of which you speak?
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:34:43 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:51:22 UTC 7 years ago
Ah, but that is historical fiction, which may or may not have any basis in fact. If you didn't like Other Boleyn girl, do not read her "Constant Princess". She so totally changed the character of Katherine of Aragon as to be unrecognizable as such and even I had a hard time finishing it.
I say this having read every biography and much of the historical fiction of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, Mary, any of Henry's wives and Mary Queen of Scots that has come out in the past 40 years. I can read historical novels by separating them from biographies and not really twitching too much about the inaccuracies/changes.
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:37:23 UTC 7 years ago
I also find anacronisms seriously jarring - unless they are there because we've got an alternate universe (i.e., steampunk a la The Difference Engine) or something of that ilk. I mean, I read a historical novel (18th c., I think) where the hero kept calling the heroine "lollipop." The ick factor was bad enough, but the term hadn't been invented yet.
November 3 2009, 18:29:57 UTC 7 years ago
I remember my first con, and sat in on the Darkover meeting? (Dude, I shouldn't have packed that lunch - room FULL of food, and people who loved to cook).
Guess you know where this is going? Yup. Someone had a recipe for klah - it included tea...and orange Tang. Among other things.
Never forgot. 1976 or so.
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:49:15 UTC 7 years ago
November 3 2009, 20:07:29 UTC 7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 17:55:46 UTC 7 years ago
I hate pretty much all variations on "one of my great-grandparents was Irish so I am going to write a cutesy romanticised version of the Old Country which my fellow USAns will not have any way of telling from realism", because that makes this born-in-Ireland-and-lived-there-twenty-y
I hate Twue Wuv conquering all in ways that mean nobody has to put any effort into it, because, as
I also, having been stalked, hate stalking-positive takes on romance with an irrational fury.
I strongly dislike first-person narratives that have no frame or reason for existence, and doubly so when the narrator is admitting to things where anyone in-universe reading their story might well lead to them getting arrested.
(So what horror-movie buzzwords mean "softcore porn", then ? My fifteen-year-old self would have made unwise deals with creepy supernatural figures for a reliable way of making that distinction.)
November 3 2009, 20:09:48 UTC 7 years ago
Buzzwords meaning "soft-core porn" often include "rustic escape," "teenage campers," "class reunion," "graduation party," and "breeding stock."
Deleted comment
November 3 2009, 18:01:19 UTC 7 years ago
One thing that will break my suspension of disbelief entirely is if you have a castle-full of people and all of them have utterly unique and distinct birth names; any culture will have some names more popular than others, and having a Big Tom and a Skinny Tom is every bit as distinct as having a Tom and a Jack.
Deleted comment
7 years ago
7 years ago
November 3 2009, 18:05:42 UTC 7 years ago
I also have a thing for names. I won't read the Sookie vampire books simply because that name sounds all sorts of wrong to me. I love October's name because it's so her, though I'm still getting used to reading about a girl called Toby. I had to stop reading one romance novel that had a heroine named Douglass. I couldn't relate that name to a girl. One epic-length fanfic I'm currently reading has a heroine named Harley Quinn (no relation to the Joker's girlfriend). It's a little too ... cutesy, but the rest of the fic is good, so I keep reading. I tend to get irked over "special" spellings of common names. Krisstofur? Jenafor? Cortnie? Candies ("Candice")? Cristel? Angelic ("Angelique")? Ugh...
November 3 2009, 20:15:50 UTC 7 years ago
I'm a little more forgiving of "special" spellings in fanfic, because when I was a teenager, I genuinely thought that one author using a name used it up forever in some magical ledger somewhere. So they're just trying to play nice with the other children.
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
7 years ago
← Ctrl ← Alt
Ctrl → Alt →